>>4772576, >>4772643, >>4772672
>>4771917 Anon sums up why the Jews arent the problem and a decoy. Well said. ism's are a decoy
>^^^^^^^ This is shill copy pasta - this should not be in notables. The names he mentions are actually jews.
I agree with above. Outgoing baker, would you please authorize current baker to remove above notable?
It contains incorrect facts.
You're the outgoing baker, meaning you're no longer in charge of the dough. Current baker is, but he won't remove your notes unless you authorize. Since you're still here, you can do that. Are you saying you won't listen to anon's requests to remove factually incorrect, known-shill post from notables?
So it's cool if current baker removes? I don't like the idea of baker's changing each other's shit (even when obvs) unless you guys give the okay. Just to keep checks on power and whatnot.
Wouldn't doubt. He baked last night too, and I think I've got him having baked a few times in recent weeks. I can check my notes if we need, but BO/BV hash check might find it too. Can we put him on the shill baker list to not be allowed to bake?
Yeah I think we should never remove another baker's notes unless that baker approves or BO/BV comes in to make the very rare call to remove when shit's blatantly, provably shill stuff that contains factually incorrect info.
>Not a shill baker, I know.
Outgoing baker not a shill? Huh.
>needs a smack in the head.
Well I wouldn't know about that kek.
>Beware of Streissand effect when removing notables though.
Heard. Ty.