>>4773465
>>4773579
>>4773593
>Also, what was the 'earlier special study'?
>Going to pull up their last SAR
DING!DING!DING!DING!
Found the 'earlier special study' from OIG NSA prior SAR
SEE PIC
'''interdasting…"a special study of NSA’s
implementation of another U.S. government (USG) organization’s Counterterrorism (CT)
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Authority."'''
'another U.S. government (USG) organization's …..FISA authority'
hrm….DOJ maybe?
https://www.oversight.gov/sites/default/files/oig-sa-reports/Searchable%20NSA%20OIG%20UNCLASS%20SAR%202nd%20Half%20FY2018_FINAL.pdf
also…they did a special study of NSA FISA related to Q #2657 and subsequent study done and report published today
'''Special Study of the National Security Agency/Central Security
Service’s Implementation of a USG Organization’s Counterterrorism
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Authority'''
The OIG conducted this study of NSA’s implementation of a USG organization’s CT FISA
authority to assess NSA’s compliance with standard procedures. The OIG’s report, which
was part of a series of studies on special authorities, revealed several deficiencies that have
the potential to impact the protection of U.S. person (USP) privacy rights. The OIG found
that, as a result of human error, incomplete understanding of the rules, and gaps in guidance,
analysts have performed some noncompliant queries in the USG organization’s CT data using
USP identifiers. We also found that incomplete documentation of internal processes and roles
and responsibilities associated with foreign dissemination of USP information derived from
the USG organization’s CT FISA activities increases the risk of noncompliance with
authorized procedures. The OIG made 14 recommendations to help NSA to address these
deficiencies.