Oh it's comfy in here

>>477712

Lawfag here. We could talk Constitutional Law all night, but that's not really on our list of tasks per Q, is it?

>>477756

Please explain

>>477840

That's the weird thing–parts of the cabal are full steam ahead as if nothing is going on. Exhibit: BHO stepping into the UN.

>>477920

Fuck off

>>478004

Where's the fraud? People are giving money of their own volition, no?

>>478063

Well fraud is a criminal offense, so it's possible. More likely to prove the behind-the-scenes planners did it because it's a crime and you can easily subpoena/warrant the digital evidence (no need for parallel construction here). Harder to prove with the kids because you'd have to prove intent and it's all private donations. Maybe a civil suit, to your point about comparable.

>>478147

If you could meme that it would be quite impressive.

Maybe they have a term in their standard contract on point, especially given the alleged fraud…

>>478171

18 USC 47 is federal fraud chapter anon, have a look.

18 USC 1038 is about "hoaxes" maybe that's on point…

>>478211

Hm, national parks?

Nah they probably host moloch parties in the woods…

>>478273

That guy shows up every bread. Shills getting subtle?

>>478280

Leaking what to whom?

>>478306

Are you new to interpreting how DJT talks?

>>478378

Dilly dilly

Great intel!

>>478409

>>478395

Really really interesting case study you've got there anon…keep trying. Show her >>478409

evidence on FB of more normies waking up. Report back with your imminent success!