TY Bakers
Bottom line: YES to life vs NO to life
Just started tracking Krassensteins. Definitely out to get Q team. Here's a consolidation of stuff from recent posts for digging.
Fox ran this several times. Too good to pass up. Stupid leftists.
I'm digging out some of the K tweets to post here right now but stepped back in for a moment….
Same anon, right? Missed this previous post. So you're saying there's an anon pimping penny stock of this of this Vystar group that makes revolutionary condoms?
Let's see–how linked to K brothers? You think K brothers are instigating the advice giving, so we violate SEC rules and get in trouble?
Moar eyes, it's all good. Trying to keep up with the board is like a full time job. Wasn't criticizing just remarking.
Moar for the Krassenstein collection:
Multiple twitter posts, earliest is last May. Don't know if they are moar. If they really do get paid for trashing Q–see below–that sorta takes away from their message, doesn't it?
Also: Notes
https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2972675
Anon's hidden camera video of Brian K. saying they get paid to take down patriots by "higher ups" to "sow division"; say they are part of "the resistance." Had seen before but didn't know it about Krassenstein. Sept 25.
I have no idea, new to this plot. Another anon (id eeb455) believes the K bros are trying to entrap anons into SEC violations. Wants to warn people, baker, BO.
Funny meme, anon. "Go back"! KEK.
Many different angles to cover there. Mine is looking at who attacks Q and the networks of people who work together to do it. Didn't know much about K bros before because I mostly track MSM articles and look at how anti-Q refer to each's opinions (basically, turning one another into conspiracy "experts" with frequent quotes). Started noticing the relationships; they seem to be part of something larger.
Shills are constantly trying to do things to get this board taken down. Why is it still here? Because people fight back, kick off CP, say "No, disagree" about stuff Q doesn't endorse.
Good to be aware of entrapment schemes, for sure. I don't begrudge patriots on YT who ask for donations because, as you point out, it's really not an easy way to make a living. For some reason, anons tend to focus on the money part, like people are getting rich.
But being PUBLIC, they get shilled really bad and it's very personal too. No hiding when your name is out there.
No more dumb that calling POTUS a Russian agent. (seems like nothing if off the table)
My dad was an expert investor. CFO for a successful company, all he did was investing. He would NEVER give investment advice; said if you're asking him for advice, you probably shouldn't be in the market.
Hard to get notables deleted. One of the disadvantages of an anon board. Communication is hard, BO is the only constant. It's like our posts: once we hit reply, they are immortalized, for better or worse. I understand why you want these posts taken down, but they will disappear soon enough even if nothing is done.
I'd focus on preventing future advice-giving attempts.
global notable
to that effect would be very helpful.
Spot on, anon.
I'm never really sure who is doing what, because of the "look over here, not there!" thing. But good to track everybody who says they're tracking us. And take stuff down that might be illegal.
All I can say is, the good guys had better win.
Pretty blunt threat. Just a larp? Better to overestimate their abilities than the opposite.
We aren't the main audience.
imperfect system, like our government (even when it's working right)
Depends on the purpose–that's the key.
Yeah, obviously part of the Great Jewish Conspiracy. Too bad Q movement doesn't divide people by religion. I'm sure you'll find another group with a more complementary view.
Let (((them))) do (((their))) own explaining.
I would really like to know how to embed like that….also when I've tried uploading mp4s they are always too big. TOP KEK.
DF IS a senior. Kek.
I've thought Q meant the admiral. If it's someone else, I have no idea who.
Some people think DF's in that pic at the airport (even tho I think Q talked in future when the drop was made).
You see the clip?
I always liked the Outer Limits. Childhood clue that all was not as it seemed.
Me neither. Just more about the Chinese trade delegation coming over here sometime soon. And of course the fact that the S China Sea was WWIII waiting to happen (according to some). Tried to post on that and it wasn't happening. Sometimes things don't get posted for a reason.
Agree, think the text will fit….
New Tactic To Suppress Online Speech: Taxing Social Media
Check out, Africa. Will this be our future?
Aware of the threat that social media poses to their power, repressive regimes in Africa have employed various methods to stifle internet-based mobilization.
These include internet shutdowns, targeted social media applications shutdowns, website takedowns, extensive surveillance of digital communications, online propaganda, and the detention of online critics, writes Babatunde Okunoye for Foreign Affairs.
According to Okunoye, in 2018, repressive governments adopted yet another tactic: taxes on social media usage.
In countries such as Uganda, Benin, Tanzania and Zambia, there are now laws in place which impose daily taxes on social media and other over-the-top services.
In Uganda, for instance, citizens have to pay 200 Ugandan Shillings (US $ 0.05) per day to access Facebook, Twitter, or WhatsApp as a law adopted last year.
Citizens of Benin have had to pay 5 CFA francs ($0.008) per megabyte consumed through social media platforms like Facebook, WhatsApp, and Twitter as stipulated by Decree No. 2018 - 341 of July 25 2018. The decree also introduces a 5 percent fee, on top of taxes, on texting and calls.
These laws also make the cost of maintaining personal websites by citizens prohibitively expensive.
As a result of the Electronic and Postal Communications Regulations 2018, citizens in Tanzania now must pay a $920 fee to receive the government’s permission to maintain a website…
Most citizens believe that these measures were drawn up to restrict the space for freedom of expression in worsening human rights contexts in countries like Uganda and Tanzania. While some of these social media taxes have been couched as measures to raise government revenue, given the poor economic situation prevalent in much of Africa, virtually everyone sees them for what they really are - attempts to stifle the right to freedom of expression and association of the millions of Africans demanding more from their governments.
>https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-15/new-tactic-suppress-online-speech-taxing-social-media
Thx, fren. I'll keep my comments here but also bring their comments here. So we can contemplate them.