>>4779019 last bread

In regards to bombing in Syria

The question here is:

Why would ISIS risk keeping the US Military in their area by successfully killing more Americans?

If anything, tactically and strategically would make more sense to lay low and play possum to lure your opposition into believing they have won. POTUS has already stated he was going to pull out. These ISIS fighters could literally sit back and chill and the military would leave.

That’s why i believe this was orchestrated not by ISIS, but by others who have a vested interest in keeping the US Military in the area. Now here’s a caveat to that and how ISIS would benefit:

If ISIS was receiving support from the US military in either protection, materiel, or funds. In that case, I could see them conducting an attack to keep those supply lines open, but that adds a follow up question of why the military would fund an officially enemy organization that publicly they are working to destroy.

Can of worms in that, and the only conclusion from that train of thought is that there are not only corrupt factions, but truly evil factions willing to kill Americans just to keep the above mentioned support going.

Simply by asking, who benefits? Answers many many questions.

>>4779620

LG went on a small soapbox this morning about it as well.

Disappointing to see him on some sides supporting POTUS policies and putting down others.

He even mentioned his trip to the area. There may have been something more notable in his “speech” but I was busy and couldn’t catch the whole statement.

>>4779795

kek

is it illegal to call in a welfare check on RGB?

>>4779803

*RBG

fucking dsylexia

>>4779823

I’m pretty sure registered letters have work around a and people authorized to sign for “packages” - ie letters. Would only make sense in terms of security precautions which is prudent for SC Justices. So i doubt that would work.

Any other ideas for proof of life methods to determine if RBG is DOA?

>4779854

Quality

Quality

Quality

Quality

Quality <- Bait

>>4779867

Yaaaaaa

but good luck with that

looking for a realistic way that an anon can get Proof of life.

Any way the average John/Jane Doe can identify if someone important is actually alive or deceased.

>>4779897

Best part about that article, is how they completely ignored him being in the presence of a criminal and the former leader of mexico.

>>4779963

SOTU address from RBGs front lawn

>>4779981

What was the dates for the $100 Million bribe to the mexican president?

What was the date between Pelosi’s lobbying efforts for APAC?

Feinstein’s?

Any correlation? And was there any campaign donations from Nieto to Pelosi or Feinstein either directly, through intermediaries, or APAC?

I’ll gotten gains?

>>4780057

Nice

I still believe this would result in a visit by the FBI though if purely for retaliatory purposes by the handlers.

I don’t think it’s a wise path to determine her POL.

She still working out? Maybe we can get someone into her gym to take pics.

I dont want to pursue ideas that could potentially land someone in trouble with the law or worse. Getting POL in a case where someone has people actively working to suppress a death could prove troublesome.

>>4780089

This copy pasta again

I know it’s bait, but it’s so illogical that I have to ask some questions.

For what purpose would the FEMA re-education camp be made?

Under what law?

How would they go about suspending habeus corpus IOT allow for a violation of several civil rights?

Would you expect the majority of the country to just accept this?

I mean, the proposal on its face is a non-starter unless you are advocating for a civil war which is what would happen if this were to come to pass.

It’s along the same lines as what china is doing with Muslims in their far east. I don’t agree with the ideaology of islam, but i also don’t agree and would not abide by something similar coming to pass in this country.

I am asking sincerely. Please respond to the above questions on why you think the above would pass muster and how it would be implemented without causing a civil war.

>>4780261

Doesn’t answer the question

What crime is being committed?

Habeus corpus cannot be suspended without cause for US Citizens, so

what would the cause be, and what crime would everyone here be accused of committing?

You understand that by posting here, you would be held under the same reasoning right?

It’s ridiculous.