>>4779405 (LB)

re; SOTU in Oval Office

Not sure. Thing with that is networks won't cover it. Remember the bullshit last week with the POTUS 8 min message? I think they have to cover SOTU in congress, but not sure, either.

Other posts popping up about about RBG has me thinking this has to be put in the calculations, too. Dems will not want a full blown SOTU where SJC's attend and RBG is missing.

I don't think the security factor is such that a workaround isn't available, otherwise 'a no SOTU' would have been baked in as possible collateral damage of a shutdown.

My big question is why put "this week" in a letter published on Wednesday? Logistics for the SOTU would have been planned to know the last possible date when a shutdown would cancel the SOTU. That means you could probably make a deadline to open the gov next week, or published today's letter last week.

>>4779560

AOC tweet after Trump says "who cares"

I bartended for years in New York City. I understand guys like this like the back of my hand.

We got under his skin

>>4780016

Johnson is a Trump fan. Could sell benefits of a WTO brexit and bilateral trade with the US. I think there's a lot of FUD being thrown around by the remainers wrt WTO brexit.