>>4780625

Oh buddy, notably ignorant, and so are some of the commentators...

Gnostics were a greek cult that proceeded Christianity and believed that what is physical is corrupt and evil. That humanity is basically good as a spirit, but evil because of flesh.

Any action performed by these luciferian twats to help the physical was evil. So eventually they died out due to starvation. Yes, eating food or water was evil.

Yes, luciferian... Lucifer rejected God's plan of God becoming a man and declared that if God was going to become a man, then "I will become like the most high" in spirit alone. Lucifer believed the physical world was beneath him, and if God was going to join it, he would become God. So Mic-ha-el (translated from Hebrew means "Who is like God?") cried out his name. Then Ga-bri-el (translated from Hebrew means "I will speak for God") spoke his name.

Make no mistake, Jesus was not gnostic, nor the apostles. Those are lies from one twisted angel himself. Those ideas are antithetical to the incarnation.

>>4781155

>>4781147

As long as there are anti (jew, christian, catholic, religion) faggotry going on here, you will get people responding to it.

>>4781089

Suck it up buttercup, this is a free speech board.

>>4781209

KEK… you really don't get it then.

The Jews (if you understand what that term REALLY means) saw two messiahs. The first was the militant king and the second was the suffering servant. The Jews really want them in that order.

So when you get the suffering servant first ("a bruised reed he will not break"), AND under oath, He claimed to be equal to God, they felt it was their civic duty to save the nation of Israel from the reaction of the Roman government. The high priest prophesied… and if you were a real biblefaggot, you would NEVER isolate John from the rest of the book that the church gave us.

It is not the bible that is wrong, it is the ignorantfags like yourself that cannot understand "the pillar and foundation of the truth" gave the bible to us.

>>4781297

WWG1WGA… rest up anon… we will need you in the fight later…

>>4781552

Looks like RBG

>>4781566

Wow, more ignorance in the jewfaggot column…

Your quotes are not from the Jewish Talmud, it is from a Halakha which is followed by few.

Give me any viewpoint, and any large group of documents and I can "prove" your bogus argument.

You really need a new hob

>>4781551

That is the problem with you bibleonlyfags… you believe that all history should be like your browser. Delete it every day so no one knows what you saw…

>>4781762

I second that motion…

>>4781785

KEK, you know nothing about me.. 'cept the fact that I made you pissed your keyboard to end up with that response.

It's okay to be an ignorant cunt, as long as you admit it, seek therapy and try to learn something everyday.

PSST the translation for the above is you don't know twat and I called you on it.