Anonymous ID: bb3b86 Jan. 16, 2019, 12:59 p.m. No.4781147   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1178 >>1222 >>1260 >>1352

>>4781089 (LB)

My apologies. I did not start with the Biblefagging, but did attempt to give opposing perspective to what had already been floated out there. Sadly, people keep making these things open issues here. I'm not sure why other than they have to try to influence those around them. I would also prefer apologetics and Bible/faith debate to not be an issue here, but again... some keep making it so.

Anonymous ID: bb3b86 Jan. 16, 2019, 1:04 p.m. No.4781199   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4781178

Yeah, I don't know? It may be so. Some are wired/programmed to evangelize. That's really not my thing. I'm too old to talk people into anything, and really, I don't care if they're saved or not. I pray for everyone but it's really out of my hands.

You can't help people who don't want to be helped. I gave up on that shit ages ago.

Anonymous ID: bb3b86 Jan. 16, 2019, 1:14 p.m. No.4781297   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1480

>>4781260

I know. Some things that are said should not go unopposed, however. We are in a real war between good and evil. It's helpful to have clearer lines drawn as to where the evil begins. I'm of a belief that gnosticism, especially in it's current incarnation, is inherently evil (this is defined by the article in my post of the LB). If people want to believe something different, that's fine but if they plan to influence people with things that do not seem to be truth, myself (and likely others) may very well bring opposing views. I've been rather ill, so I don't/can't always have the energy to respond. I'm definitely not up for arguments. Not my thing.

Anonymous ID: bb3b86 Jan. 16, 2019, 1:22 p.m. No.4781422   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1442

>>4781352 Agreed. The problem is: They don't start the new age gnosticism "we are all god/God" slide in another thread. They do it here, unchecked and without one of us saying something: Unmitigated. I try not to let it go on and on, but I will put truth as I know it out there backed with sauce (again, as per my previous post). As we can see, they who wish to perpetuate the slide with not only do so, but be derisive while doing so. At that point, I just ignore and do not perpetuate the obvious argumentative slide.

Anonymous ID: bb3b86 Jan. 16, 2019, 1:30 p.m. No.4781521   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1571

>>4781471 I've often reflected on the card that shows the large groups of people being overseen by what appears to be The Hermit. Looks like the "caravans" to me, but may also be the Yellow Vest protests? (Upper right hand corner of related pic)

Anonymous ID: bb3b86 Jan. 16, 2019, 1:39 p.m. No.4781610   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1688

>>4781571

>(Yellow symbolism isn't confined to vests)

Agreed, as much as orange. However, my observation was related to the large group of persons obviously marching/protesting in general. I don't put it past these people to astroturf ALL of these protests/caravans/chaos.