Anonymous ID: f224ac Jan. 16, 2019, 1:04 p.m. No.4781209   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1453

>>4781137

Wierd that John wrote in the bible that they were there listening to Jesus, but never bought into the whole Messiah thing, huh. I guess the bible is wrong, and your sources are better than the bible.

Anonymous ID: f224ac Jan. 16, 2019, 1:14 p.m. No.4781300   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1446

>>4781242

>>4781253

These things. The things that if the world knew were really in charge of the global elite, and that the global elite not only consulted them, but followed their orders, and worshiped them, the world would descend into chaos and madness.

Anonymous ID: f224ac Jan. 16, 2019, 1:27 p.m. No.4781471   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1479 >>1521 >>1547

>>4781388

“I wouldn’t normally dedicate an entire article analyzing the cover of a publication, but this isn’t any publication. It is The Economist and it is directly related to the world elite. It is partly owned by the Rothschild banking family of England and its editor-in-chief, John Micklethwait, attended several times to the Bilderberg Conference – the secretive meeting where the world’s most powerful figures from the world of politics, finance business and media discuss global policies. The outcome of those meetings is totally secret. It is therefore safe to say that the people at The Economist know things that most people don’t.”

Vigilant Citizen

 

The influential publication The Economist released its traditional end of year edition where it predicts events of the coming year. The 2017 edition is presented in a very occult fashion: A tarot deck modified with cryptic symbols.

 

If you thought that 2016 was not a great year, well The Economist does not seem too optimistic about the year to come. Indeed, in its “The Year in 2017” cover, the publication predicts death and turmoil in a dark occult context, using tarot cards and cryptic symbolism.

 

When The Economist released The World in 2015 cover, I simply had to write an extensive article about it because it alluded, through symbolism, to various agendas of the elite. Indeed, The Economist is not your typical magazine, it is a ‘prestigious’ publication owned by powerful people. As I’ve written in the 2015 article:

 

“I wouldn’t normally dedicate an entire article analyzing the cover of a publication, but this isn’t any publication. It is The Economist and it is directly related to the world elite. It is partly owned by the Rothschild banking family of England and its editor-in-chief, John Micklethwait, attended several times to the Bilderberg Conference – the secretive meeting where the world’s most powerful figures from the world of politics, finance business and media discuss global policies. The outcome of those meetings is totally secret. It is therefore safe to say that the people at The Economist know things that most people don’t.”

 

While some images on that 2015 cover referred to obvious events, others were extremely cryptic – even ‘coded’ – as they were never satisfactorily explained.

 

This year’s edition is even more enigmatic. It uses the tarot to predict the year to come. Here it is.

 

The Economist's "The World in 2017" Makes Grim Predictions Using Cryptic Tarot Cards

 

The first thing one can say about this cover is that it is occult. The tarot is indeed said to contain within its symbolism the entirety of occult mysteries transmitted by secret societies. Also, considering that the cards of the Major Arcana are also referred to as “trumps”, it was a great way to emphasize that next year will be very influenced by Trump’s election.

 

Donald Trump is sitting on the globe while holding an orb and a scepter – objects referring to a monarchy. In other words, Trump is the king of the world. Monarchy and democracy are political systems that are extremely different. The Economist appears to be predicting that Trump will rule the world like a monarch.

 

Fortune

This card refers to the upcoming elections in three European nations: France, Germany and the Netherlands. Marine LePen, Angela Merkel, and Geert Wilders are attached to a spinning wheel next to election ballots.

 

The world of politics is also cyclic and, according to The Economist, a smiling Marine Le Pen is heading towards the top of the wheel while a pouting Merkel is upside down and heading down. To make things worse, Merkel is next to dark cloud while Le Pen is under a nice clear sky. Is Merkel heading towards a bitter defeat? Will her controversial “open door policy”, which allowed the entrance of over a million refugees in Germany in the past years, cause her to lose?

Anonymous ID: f224ac Jan. 16, 2019, 1:33 p.m. No.4781551   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1761

>>4781453

Wow. It's like your reading comprehension is zero.

Claim: the gnostics started before Jesus.

Fact: the gnostics started after Jesus' ministry, as detailed by John. And since gnosticism at its core rejects the salvation provided by Jesus, God in the flesh, the logos, it could not have preceeded Jesus in any way, shape or form.

Anonymous ID: f224ac Jan. 16, 2019, 1:34 p.m. No.4781561   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4781460

Three types of sin. Lust of the eyes, lust of the flesh, pride of life. Porn plays on all three, and ruins any relationship you may have otherwise had irl.

Anonymous ID: f224ac Jan. 16, 2019, 1:36 p.m. No.4781571   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1610 >>1688

>>4781521

While The Hermit card in the Rider-Waite deck is rather simple, The Economist’s version is dense and full of turmoil. It depicts hordes of people marching while holding flags rejecting the TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership), the TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) and the EU (European Union). Other flags simply say ‘STOP’ and ‘NO’ which reflect general of globalization and the agenda surrounding it. Hermits live in seclusion of society and these people want to live in seclusion from the world order.

 

At the bottom right of the card is a cracked globe, another ominous symbol referring to profound division and destruction.

 

(Yellow symbolism isn't confined to vests)

Anonymous ID: f224ac Jan. 16, 2019, 1:37 p.m. No.4781592   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4781474

Dennis Prager has a funny question when people say something truly insane: "From which university did you receive your graduate degree?". Graduate schools pump out absolute idiots.