Anonymous ID: e8bb50 Jan. 16, 2019, 2:38 p.m. No.4782353   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>2408

>>4782314

It was spoopy, as are these two.

Separated by only 500ft.

There was an article I read yesterday talking about some B52's were supposed to have been denuked and pretty much outfitted for commercial use by Russia.

This is the one.

>https://www.military.com/dodbuzz/2019/01/15/russia-claims-us-violating-treaty-over-unverified-b-52-bombers-missiles.html

Anonymous ID: e8bb50 Jan. 16, 2019, 2:40 p.m. No.4782393   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>2431

>>4782327

There is one called the TR3B. Triangular craft that I've actually seen in action with my own eyes. One of the moar stranger encounters I've had. Doubt that was it though, they don't tend to have classified craft on trackers, I wouldn't think.

There's no telling what they have now.

Anonymous ID: e8bb50 Jan. 16, 2019, 2:49 p.m. No.4782497   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>4782408

Just think it's dasting we have all this B52 action and then I see that article talking about START and Russia not being too happy with the US.

o7 planefag.

>>4782431

Indeed on some instances. Makes you think where we got the tech from though. What did we back-engineer to develop these crafts?

Waiting on the invasion here, kek.