Anonymous ID: 7a1935 Jan. 16, 2019, 4:08 p.m. No.4783441   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3476 >>3549

lb

>>4783011

Natural Born = 2 citizen parents. Go read about it i n Law of Nations by Vattel. It was the book of the time and heavily leaned on by founding fathers. A person born in US with a British subject father could not be president because they could not be trusted and would likely have the loyalty of the father. BTW IF Obama was born to a Kenyan father, based on the time the father and thus Obama would have been British Subjects(Kenya British Protectorate), the EXACT reason found fathers would not allow it. All the fakery since acts like there is no definition of Natural Born which is total bullshit.

Vattel on “natural born citizens,” “inhabitants,” and “naturalized citizens.”

 

From our beginning, we were subjects of the British Crown. With the War for Independence, we became citizens.[1] [READ this footnote!] We needed new concepts to fit our new status as citizens. Vattel provided these new republican concepts of “citizenship”. The gist of what Vattel says in Law of Nations, Book I, Ch. XIX, at §§ 212-217, is this:

 

§ 212: Natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens - it is necessary that they be born of a father who is a citizen. If a person is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

http://www.newswithviews.com/Publius/huldah110.htm

Anonymous ID: 7a1935 Jan. 16, 2019, 4:39 p.m. No.4783826   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4127 >>4152 >>4167

>>4783549

Natural Born was a common term during the time. No definition needed. NOT A LAW??? Its in the CONSTITUTION! The term has been subverted like everything else. Do yourself a favor and read this article in it's entirety. There are a a million more where it came from but read it.

http://www.newswithviews.com/Publius/huldah110.htm