Research Psychologist Epstein: Google Manipulation shifted 800,000 to 4.6 million votes in 2018 Election (VIDEO)

In a previous appearance on Tucker Carlson Tonight Epstein revealed that Google can take a 50-50 split among undecided voters and change it into a 90-10 split with no one knowing they had been manipulated and without leaving a paper trail… It has to do with their search suggestions.

On Thursday Dr. Epstein revealed that just one Google shift in search results on Election Day 2018 shifted from 800,000 to 4.6 million votes to Democratic candidates.

This follows the shocking Breitbart exposé by Allum Bokhari published Thursday that proves Google has been manipulating search results.

Of course the Big Tech companies have only been targeting only conservative websites and publications since the 2016 election.

>>4785777 Sauce

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/01/research-psychologist-epstein-google-manipulation-shifted-800000-to-4-6-million-votes-in-2018-election-video/

WHAT COULD GO WRONG? “Report for America, an initiative of the GroundTruthProject, Google, and others, plans to place 1,000 journalists in local newsrooms over the next five years,”

DNC-MSM house organ Columbia Journalism Reviewreports:

Writing in CJR, the project’s co-founders argue that America needs “a dramatically new approach at the local level—grounded less in the traditional commercial model and more on a reawakened spirit of public service among reporters.”

Steven Waldman and Charles M. Sennott say that they want to model their initiative on organizations like the Peace Corps and Teach for America, providing opportunities and support to emerging journalists while also helping newsrooms around the country do civically important reporting. Waldman first pitched the idea in the pages of CJR more than two years ago, calling for a new national service program dedicated to journalism.

Shades of the conversation that David Westin, then-president of ABC News, had shortly after the 2004 election with Tina Brown, back when she had a show on CNBC, which Rush Limbaugh paraphrased as “We need more foreign correspondents in Alabama:”

RUSH: So, anyway, she’s got David Westin on the program, and she says, “David, would you have a reporter/producer live in any of these communities?” She’s talking about the red states of America here, folks. “Would you have a reporter/producer live in any of these communities and saturate themselves in these cultures so that they get more stories from those communities?”

WESTIN: I think we don’t do that enough, and I’m not just talking religious communities. I’m talking all sorts of communities across the country. I think that… You understand this, Tina, living in New York or in Los Angeles, we have busy jobs. We go into the office every day. We tend to socialize with the same people, or the same types of people, and I think it’s terribly important for journalists to get out whether it’s overseas or domestically and try to understand.

RUSH: We need more foreign correspondents in Alabama! We need more foreign correspondents north of Palm Beach County in Florida! We need embeds to go to church, find out what’s going on with these holy rollers! Ah, folks, you can’t know how much I love this.

On Google’s journalists as Peace Corps initiative, the Columbia Journalism Review concludes:

Report for America won’t save journalism, just as Teach For America can’t save teaching, and the Peace Corps hasn’t brought about an era of global unity. But in a time of crisis for local newsrooms, it’s a bold attempt to reinvigorate a vital organ of American society.

Nothing like viewing yourself as a member of the Peace Corps having parachuted into a strange unknown town to provide the proper level of condescension when reporting local news. Will Ted Striker and Elaine Dickinson join the team?

https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/what-could-go-wrong-report-for-america-an-initiative-of-the-groundtruthproject-google-and-others-plans-to-place-1000-journalists-in-local-newsrooms-over-the-next-five-years/

Large Releases of Chaff Over Several States Seen on Radar

Saturation chaff?

Motors feed chaff from rolls of about 40 pounds through cutters carried on some aircraft to produce either bursts or a continuous stream. The continuous stream technique, called saturation chaff, may be used by aircraft to cover a large area. By 2005 or 2006, the Army also planned to use saturation chaff to mask vehicle and troop movements. Using a cutter, 360 pounds of chaff from nine 40-pound rolls can be deployed in 10 minutes. Depending on the method and the number of aircraft, such releases could disperse billions of fibers. The B-52 can carry about 750 seven-ounce boxes of chaff; each box contains up to 11 million fibers that can be expelled continuously or in bursts.

Via: WarZone:

Two days after a huge cloud of chaff lit up weather radar covering portions Illinois, Indiana, and Kentucky, as well as social media, more plumes have now appeared over Maine and Florida. We have no official confirmation as of yet, but the formations look very similar in composition to the one that developed in the Midwest.

The first reports of the apparent chaff plumes in Maine began to appear on social media around 5:30 PM EST on Dec. 12, 2018. Early on, four distinct clouds were visible, but these had blended together into a larger blob with a peak length of more than 100 miles by 7:45 PM. The huge cloud was moving southwest and looked like it could easily drift into New Hampshire and beyond.

https://www.cryptogon.com/?p=54122

Australian Government Causing Death and Disability with Mandatory Vaccination Policies

Welcome to the first newsletter for 2019. I started these newsletters in 2012 when the mainstream Australian media started presenting false and misleading information about my university research to the public. This was a result of the Australian Skeptics Inc lobby groups and their offshoot SAVN and the Friends of Science in Medicine – deceptively named well-funded lobby groups that are promoting pharma’s interests in government vaccination policies (astroturfing).

If this wasn’t the case in Australia then the government would not need to suppress my academic research from public debates and discussion and from court cases on vaccination. For those of you who have missed this suppression here is the conference that was held on the 30 June 2018 in Sydney titled ‘The Censorship of the Vaccination Debate in Australia’.

I would highly recommend that you listen to Elizabeth Hart’s presentation, Jamie McIntyre’s presentation and Judy Wilyman’s presentation to help you understand why the Australian government cannot allow the public to debate these health issues with the academic arguments.

This is because vaccination policies are not about promoting ‘health’ in the community they are about promoting vaccines (big business) in the community and this is why children’s health is significantly declining with the addition or every new vaccine that is recommended by the government.

The government doesn’t promote these policies with statistics on the improvements in children’s health that these policies will provide – because these statistics do not exist.

Instead you will notice that the mainstream media is trying to normalise the significant increase in chronic illnesses in children that were not present prior to the 1990s. These diseases are preventable with an academic debate on the number of vaccines that we use and the strategies used to control infectious diseases in the 1950s/’60s.

You will also notice that the government and medical research institutions are trying to blame every other cause for this increase in chronic illness – except vaccines. Vaccines are the most plausible cause for these diseases because they include environmental toxins that all children are exposed to. Yet the government has never investigated this direct correlation in long-term health studies that use an inert placebo.

If this fact was not true then my PhD would not have been approved by the University of Wollongong and this fact represents a breach of the government’s duty of care to the Australian public.

This also explains why my expert witness report for a court case in December 2018 was leaked to the Australian media when Peter McIntyre (government representative) was drafted into the case, out of proceedings, to respond to my affidavit.

The leaking of my affidavit to the media with false information is a Commonwealth crime that is punishable with up to one year in prison.

https://www.naturalblaze.com/2019/01/australian-government-causing-death-and-disability-with-mandatory-vaccination-policies.html