Anonymous ID: 986c81 Jan. 16, 2019, 7:13 p.m. No.4785796   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5840 >>5853 >>5916 >>6474

Riddle me this, anons. Why as recently as TODAY, to channels like NatGeo feel the need to combat flat earthers? Why such a consistent force of the narrative if the truth is so abundantly evident and the opposition is so niche and moronic?

 

I've never been suspicious about this topic, but the way the MSM treats this topic is more in line with how they deceive rather than inform, and it's got my spidey-senses tingling.

Anonymous ID: 986c81 Jan. 16, 2019, 7:34 p.m. No.4786079   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6099 >>6118

>>4785956

 

compared to

 

>>4785916

 

&

>>4785968

 

has motivated me to take a look down this particular rabbit hole. Not saying it's true, but I do know that when one side seems genuinely curious and the other rudely/angrily/condescendingly shuts them down, there's usually a "there" there.

 

I don't like being told there's a "no-go zone" of thought on a free speech, 40k foot view board. And I'm suspicious of those enforcing one and the narrative they insist cannot be questioned.