I can do another one, baker.
But if another baker can bake, would prefer to handoff to you. Haven't had din din yet.
Confirming handoff?
I can do another one, baker.
But if another baker can bake, would prefer to handoff to you. Haven't had din din yet.
Confirming handoff?
>baker is implying that this is part of a plan.
Q doesn't want anyone to suffer needlessly, and as a military man, most certainly does not want his men to be sacrificed as mere pawns. Notables aren't endorsements, fren. Baker is just cataloguing theories and dugg info. That said, this anon agrees that predictions should have a very high standard of vetting. And this one:
>So theres a notable that Q predicted see eye A would murder is special ops trops one year ago??
does strain belief. No, I don't believe Q would or could predict the C_A would act in such a way. Don't let our hits and misses along the way discourage you to the overall good purpose of our work, and of Q/POTUS's intent. Most of us are here bc we've been put the thru hell while just trying to be honest workers, fighters and patriots. It's hard to learn to trust again, but Q has given many reasons to do so. So have we here done that for each other, however imperfect we are as we go about it. We are grateful for your service, patriot. Hang in there, the worst is almost behind us.
Wasn't a comment on the integrity of the C_A (we all know they're evil as evil comes) but on the integrity of Q.
Yup. Imagine if this was you job. Crashing weddings and attempting to get bride and groom into bed with anyone but each other. One wedding after another, day after day. Shills are living the pathetically irrelevant sidelines hecklers hell they deserve.