>>4786276 (pb)
for curiosity's sake, has the Q team ever weighed in on Bill Cooper one way or the other?
what gets me is no one (libtards, progs, even normies) has a problem with the obvious efforts to stifle and control information.
They go on and on, publicly about how POTUS shouldn't be allowed to speak unfiltered, and that's not even factoring in the blatant censorship the tech mafia engages in on a daily basis.
the public should be sharpening pitchforks
back then we bid, but I knew we would never get the contract to build that.
not connected enough. not dirty enough.
>>2000000
archive doesn't go back that far from what I can see.
was that the original post of the graphic anon saved?
damnable Swedes