Anonymous ID: e826f9 Jan. 16, 2019, 10:22 p.m. No.4787892   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4787816

Yes, that was me:

>>4787609

I thought it was real, but for which quickly I acknowledged said error:

>>4787637

>>4787621

Then (YOU) said this:

>>4787686

In which you accused me of being part of a shill. To which I responded:

>>4787747

To which you responded:

>>4787775

In which you said:

>You still claiming youโ€™re the Baker when >>4787629 handed off to >>4787348 here?

NEITHER of which 4787629 or 4787348 is ME, so I responded:

>>4787797

To which you responded:

>>4787816

To which I responded

>>4787816

Yes, that was me:

 

Get it?

Have another Fuq U from me, fren.