FWIW another train just went by but did NOT do Q in morse code. i've just noticed a strange preponderance of trains going by doing Q in morse code. as if the Q team (or fans) have taken over the railroad lines
tip of the hat to ya there anon
in the beginning it seemed like there were Q approved graphics with drops in single pngs in chronological order.
question is are these drops in any kind of chronological order at all? i see a lot of thinking that there's a 1 year delta or a 1 year delta minus 2 days, but some anons make what look like 6 month deltas. either it's delayed a certain amount of time or it's not - making it dependent on some other kind of link in order for it to be read meaningfully. IMO the time delay theory has not added up to anything of note. anyone disagree?
it's interesting to think there may be another way of putting the posts on the calendar without using a delta. i can't really think of anything to use to do that. what's the method to the madness? if it is madness though, and the drops are irrelevant when they are dropped, that means anons are still grasping at straws. then you have the infamous no name drop. that was 30 days to relevance. can't apply that rule to the other drops though
kek, noted
>so the fbi is spying on trump
>fisa court is spying on trump
>george papadopoulos wants to spy on trump
somehow george can't be friends with the fbi?
does that actually make sense to you?
a tip of that hat to ya, for that
kek
I disagree. I seriously doubt there is anything that sophisticated going on. All for what, pretty much.
How could a delta be a checksum? And what would be the point of a checksum when Q has a tripcode and POTUS has a Twitter handle?
i think what you're proposing there doesn't rise to the level of a critical layer of meaning. seems like you're saying in 1 box would be mccain, and in the connecting box us senator. if you need a line to tell you that u might have bigger problems to worry about
ok. if a line between 2 boxes is a spider, what is a spider?
what's a connection? that's the big question when looking at the big picture
if there's so much as a link to that article it will be extremely disappointing
i like the way you think, anon
if Q wants to publish the transcript i am ok with that