Anonymous ID: 618807 Jan. 17, 2019, 2:54 a.m. No.4789161   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9192

>>4789084

in the beginning it seemed like there were Q approved graphics with drops in single pngs in chronological order.

 

question is are these drops in any kind of chronological order at all? i see a lot of thinking that there's a 1 year delta or a 1 year delta minus 2 days, but some anons make what look like 6 month deltas. either it's delayed a certain amount of time or it's not - making it dependent on some other kind of link in order for it to be read meaningfully. IMO the time delay theory has not added up to anything of note. anyone disagree?

Anonymous ID: 618807 Jan. 17, 2019, 3:48 a.m. No.4789335   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9337 >>9340

>>4789192

it's interesting to think there may be another way of putting the posts on the calendar without using a delta. i can't really think of anything to use to do that. what's the method to the madness? if it is madness though, and the drops are irrelevant when they are dropped, that means anons are still grasping at straws. then you have the infamous no name drop. that was 30 days to relevance. can't apply that rule to the other drops though

Anonymous ID: 618807 Jan. 17, 2019, 4:23 a.m. No.4789457   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4789354

I disagree. I seriously doubt there is anything that sophisticated going on. All for what, pretty much.

 

How could a delta be a checksum? And what would be the point of a checksum when Q has a tripcode and POTUS has a Twitter handle?

Anonymous ID: 618807 Jan. 17, 2019, 4:27 a.m. No.4789474   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9510

>>4789356

i think what you're proposing there doesn't rise to the level of a critical layer of meaning. seems like you're saying in 1 box would be mccain, and in the connecting box us senator. if you need a line to tell you that u might have bigger problems to worry about