Anonymous ID: 85b9c8 Jan. 17, 2019, 1:28 a.m. No.4788903   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4788817

I see, so perhaps those responsible for the WaPo code today had been in the dark about their own relative danger until very recently…. and now going OH SHIT!!!!!! FIRE OFF ANYTHING WE HAVE LEFT!!!!!! - too late now tho, the way our side worked was to keep the bad guys in the dark as long as possible and it was an elaborate game of hiding our movement in the guise of other movements. Or so I interpret it as.

 

I look forward to the big frog party we are going to have

Anonymous ID: 85b9c8 Jan. 17, 2019, 4:13 a.m. No.4789420   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9431

>>4789399

>>4789302

 

from two days ago - "everything is symbolism"

 

Rush has known since before the beginning of our movement. I know this for many reasons. An anon was talking about yesterday how he was talking about a storm all day - it's getting close now.

Anonymous ID: 85b9c8 Jan. 17, 2019, 4:28 a.m. No.4789480   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9483

>>4789455

Kim is complicated, I've been paying attention for a while and got screwed by the bad guys and for a while he was in their pockets (or doing an exceptional job of acting the part of it) - I read the media codes and know that one of the bad guys plays was to use Kim as the star witness in what would have been the Trump impeachment proceedings as the tech specialist. The goal was to ingraciate him with anon's and then have him flip as many as he could - but whether he decided to do that or not, he either realized the bad guys were going to lose or was playing them for fools.

 

I know the person who eventually secured him was Mike Pompeo - and he recorded a lot of conversations of the bad guys making deals with him.

 

either way I'm looking forward to the full story as I know a lot more of it than most but the finer details are fascinating.

 

George Webb has talked a lot about him, but I'd never be able to find those videos given how many he makes.

Anonymous ID: 85b9c8 Jan. 17, 2019, 5:02 a.m. No.4789639   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9644

>>4789558

it was my notable - here is where I decode things for folks https://twitter.com/CodesUcq - check the sticky for some basic decodes. If you have questions about decoding I can answer them. The ted turner one was an old decode that I put on that post for context, there's a lot to say about Drudge decodes - and there is merit in them.