Anonymous ID: 0ca4ef Jan. 17, 2019, 4:38 p.m. No.4797825   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7840 >>7945 >>8008 >>8131

a decode of "p = c" and cabal top tier hierarchy

 

So I was thinking about it recently, and I think I finally got a grip on the whole "p = c" thing that q posted.

 

So we know that the NWO worship satan, or at least the notion of satan, in some form:

 

q #133

 

Triangle has (3) sides.

Eye of Providence.

Follow the bloodlines.

What is the keystone?

Does Satan exist?

Does the ‘thought’ of Satan exist?

Who worships Satan?

What is a cult?

Epstein island.

What is a temple?

What occurs in a temple?

Worship?

Why is the temple on top of a mountain?

How many levels might exist below?

What is the significance of the colors, design and symbol above the dome?

Why is this relevant?

Who are the puppet masters?

Have the puppet masters traveled to this island?

When? How often? Why?

“Vladimir Putin: The New World Order Worships Satan”

Q

 

So the triangle has 3 sides:

 

q #299:

 

Rothschilds (cult leaders)(church)(P)

Banks / Financial Institutions

WW Gov Control

Gov Controls People

SA

Oil Tech Sex/Children

SA Controls (assigned) US / UK Politicians / Tech Co's (primary)

Soros

Controls organizations of people (create division / brainwash) + management / operator of slush funds (personal net worth never reduces think DOJ settlements Consumer Iran Enviro pacts etc etc)

 

So these are the 3 sides of the triangle. We also know that on top there exists the eye of providence.

 

And we know that all governments and all global scams are there to feed "the eye".

 

q #133:

 

Many governments of the world feed the ‘Eye’.

Think slush funds (feeder).

Think war (feeder).

Think environmental pacts (feeder).

 

So the eye of providence is the top of their cult, on top of the triangle. the connection to satan, his guidance.

 

So we have a cult, with Rothschilds as the cult leaders, but a cult of WHO? Every cult must have a high priest and a church, a connection to the worshiped deity - Satan

 

Here is where the Payseurs come to play'

 

q #999:

 

The "Chair" serves the Master.

Who is the Master?

P = C.

Q

 

'''So the master is the one that is being worshipped - Satan.

And P (Payseur) (see attached), are the Chair of satan, i.e. the "high priests".'''

 

No wonder that q called Payseur "the best".

 

q #714:

 

Mess with the best, die like the rest.

[2] highly classified clown ops exposed.

[44] remaining.

Wizards & Warlocks.

Save the best for last.

[P]

Q

Anonymous ID: 0ca4ef Jan. 17, 2019, 4:43 p.m. No.4797887   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7915 >>7932 >>7972 >>8034

>>4797842

 

fake and gay:

 

http://talmud.faithweb.com/articles/three.html

 

and this is the source of the fakery:

 

>talmud unmasked, a book published in 1892 by Justinas Bonaventure Pranaitis (1861–1917).

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Talmud_Unmasked

 

The author is the same clown that was exposed as a complete fraud in the Beilis trial.

He was brought over as an "expert", and got completely exposed as a fraud:

 

>One prosecution witness, presented as a religious expert in Judaic rituals, was a Catholic priest, Justinas Pranaitis from Tashkent, well known for his antisemitic 1892 work Talmud Unmasked. Pranaitis testified that the murder of Yushchinsky was a religious ritual, associating the murder of Yushchinsky with the blood libel, a legend believed by many Russians at the time.

 

>Pranaitis' credibility rapidly evaporated when the defense demonstrated his ignorance of some simple Talmudic concepts and definitions, such as hullin,[1]:p.215 to the point where "many in the audience occasionally laughed out loud when he clearly became confused and couldn't even intelligibly answer some of the questions asked by my lawyer."[3]

 

>A Beilis Defense Committee advisor, a writer named Ben-Zion Katz, suggested countering Father Pranaitis with questions like "When did Baba Bathra live and what was her activity" which he described as the equivalent of asking an American "Who lived at the Gettysburg Address?" There were enough Jews in the court for the resultant laughter to negate Pranatis' value to the prosecution.[1]:pp.214-216

 

KEK!

 

>A Tsarist secret police agent is quoted, reporting on Pranaitis' testimony, as saying: Cross-examination of Pranaitis has weakened evidentiary value of his expert opinion, exposing lack of knowledge of texts, insufficient knowledge of Jewish literature. Because of amateurish knowledge and lack of resourcefulness, Pranaitis' expert opinion is of very low value.

 

KEK!

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menahem_Mendel_Beilis

 

let the shill kvetching begin!