>>4800470 PB

SHILL Attack on Tucker Carlson PB

Fuck off, shill. Fuck your attack on TC using the Fallacy of the excluded middle, where people are portrayed either saints or sinners, with no middle ground.

You also use false logic & glittering generality technique:

Q says "MSM is fake news,"

TC is part of Fox,

therefore Tucker is a SHILL.

Truth: Tucker has been under intense attack by Antifa and others for several months, probably because he's so EFFECTIVE at defeating leftists with his logic, wit, and humor.

ALL THE COMMENTS YOU CITE AS EVIDENCE OF A "COVER UP " ARE ACTUALLY EXAMPLES OF

IRONY

as you well know.

'''(((You))) SHILL,

are the one delivering the carefully crafted message to your audience, crafted to fool newfags and fools into believing your LIES.'''

TRUTH OR GTFO!!!

>>4800760

>https://www.theepochtimes.com/chinese-teen-who-sold-kidney-for-an-iphone-is-now-bedridden-for-life-reports_2769890.html

You don't even understand the purpose of the show. TC's job is not to drop bombshells, it is to edge people normies closer to the truth by juxtaposing truth and lies, and inviting viewers to notice the difference thru the skillful use of humor, facts, and irony. He uses humor the way we use MEMES.

>>4800856

Working for MSM is a tradeoff–big audience but many restrictions within which one must work. He knows that; see his interview with Dave Rubin, where TC notes Rubin's freedom (compared to TC's).

>>4800818

In what way, specifically, are Tucker's shows getting worse? Unsupporting overgeneralizations are not good arguments, anon.

>>4800886

If Fox is all shills, why does POTUS still does interviews with Hannity? Is POTUS a shill, too??>>4800856

>>4800765

Please tell me specifically what your problem is with Jordan Peterson. He is a free speech advocate and I support much of what he says.

>>4800867

Tucker's job is to raise questions, not provide answers. He believes that each viewer has to provide his own answers, but in light of logic and facts, not leftist fantasy.

>>4800966

Some people work inside the system others outside. When you work within, you are constrained. Look at Bongino on his own show vs Fox. Much franker on his own show but doesn't reach the same audience. There are many ways to work not just one.

>>4800967

Totally agree. Really, part of my point–not to judge people just by "the company they kept" (POTUS also "associated with" Epstein, as everyone knows. Doesn't make him a pedo.)

It's just plain dumb to assume that every single person who is associated with MSM is a shill, just because the MSM is general is full of shills.

If someone wants to make the argument that a specific person is a shill, let them cite specific examples not glittering generalities.

LOW IQ ARGUMENTS don't help our efforts.

>>4801030

I'm not sure I get your point. Do you want TC to be more blunt? To "state the truth" rather than answering questions? I can understand that his style is not everyone's cup of tea because it compels listeners to make their own judgments. He will not tell people how to think, he has too much respect for them to do that. This is the same thing Q does here. Never tells us what to think but always to think for ourselves. That is a difficult thing to accept, we would rather be "fed" the truth. But that's not what liberty is about.

>>4801078

Unintelligent response, anon, "Go clean your room." Fuck your lazy ass, that you won't make an argument to defend your anti-Peterson views. People like you always say it's because it's "obvious." If so, should only take a few sentences to explain. But you won't make the effort.

>>4801126

Thanks anon great material. Did you see this? Posted after your post the other night. There's another post with a bunch of Krassenstein tweets:

>>4775770 (You), >>4775786, >>4775770 (You), >>4775834, >>4775869, >>4775943 (You) Moar for the Krassenstein collection

>>4801189

It is not venting. Challenged the person who trashed TC last bread to put up or shut up. LOW IQ attacks need to be challenged. Make them argue properly for their charges.

>>4801201

Venting on your part, anon, but I take personal attacks seriously. Division-fagging unless well-documented. That's what shills do, not anons.

>>4801236

No worries here, anon. We have the facts, the arguments, and the truth. But understanding who acts against Q movement & POTUS and how they operate gets us ahead of the game. KEK.

>>4801288

Ok, let me understand. What is the "it" to which you refer? What is well-documented? Sincere question. I really want to understand what this is all about, from your POV.