Anonymous ID: dc0cf5 Jan. 17, 2019, 10:08 p.m. No.4801779   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1802

>>4801341

Hear, hear!

 

I always felt like he put in a real slimy subversion effort on Ron Paul back in his bid for the nomination.

 

More recently, I felt there was something off about his supposed attack by antifa. He claimed his wife wouldn’t or didn’t or may not even know who or what antifa was. And, that dramatic filmed confrontation at the DC cocktail party felt like a a continuation of the publicity stunt.

 

That said, I watch his show, but I could never trust him.

 

I was shocked to see it in notables to especially with the whole “Truth or GTFO!” when anon was expressing a subtle feeling. Reaction on adds to my suspicions. Muh over the target much?

 

My two cents.

Anonymous ID: dc0cf5 Jan. 17, 2019, 10:24 p.m. No.4801930   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2035

>>4801863

The defense of TC in the notables was way OTT regardless. Anons original point was that TC gave him a very subtle sense of unease to which I completely relate. I get it every time TC claims to battle “pomposity” of all things.

 

Still I agree that he has some good segments. But how would he be good controlled opposition if he didn’t?

Anonymous ID: dc0cf5 Jan. 17, 2019, 10:41 p.m. No.4802069   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4802035

Original anon didn’t claim anything other than state his feeling with which many agree. Good controlled op will always contain plausible deniability.