dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Anonymous ID: 451922 Jan. 17, 2019, 11:32 p.m. No.4802428 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>2437 >>2445 >>2465 >>2468 >>2498 >>2534

anons seen this?

Anonymous ID: 451922 Jan. 17, 2019, 11:34 p.m. No.4802449 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>2534

can't find correlation in it yet, not direct anyway

Anonymous ID: 451922 Jan. 17, 2019, 11:36 p.m. No.4802468 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>2534 >>2573

Below is heliplot recorded waves past 24h (I'm using Germany but it's mostly in sync)

Above is GCP chart, correlation in random data generated around the world

http://global-mind.org/gcpdot/gcpchart.php

https://earthquake.usgs.gov/monitoring/operations/heliplot.php

Anonymous ID: 451922 Jan. 17, 2019, 11:45 p.m. No.4802521 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>2528 >>2571

Not sure yet

Why I'm looking at it, pic/crumb related

Anonymous ID: 451922 Jan. 17, 2019, 11:55 p.m. No.4802587 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>2620

thanks, anon

My understanding is that both zones [below 5%] and [above 95%] imply high correlation

Anonymous ID: 451922 Jan. 18, 2019, 12:06 a.m. No.4802666 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>2688

I would, but the only data available is always past 24h.

I made a script to leave running to grab the data and archive and did so for about a week. Still need to get around to analyze it.

Working mainly on the map atm…

Anonymous ID: 451922 Jan. 18, 2019, 12:20 a.m. No.4802752 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>2771 >>2838

I was talking about gcp data.

Didn't check heliplots but it's certainly more mainstream so I assumed wouldn't be the limiting factor.

Anonymous ID: 451922 Jan. 18, 2019, 12:23 a.m. No.4802764 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>2784

isn't he supposed to go @ davos?

might be