>>4802771 (PB)

>>4802838 (PB)

I was looking for the dot data only..

thanks, lots of info.

>>4802859

that's my take too

we should share idea and we can come up with a tool

My starting point is a tool that can link each crumb line and comments on it.

Doing a graphical UI is probably complicated but even text form would help digging IMO

>>4802894

have a WIP list?

>>4802957

My take is we need user-made connections.

Also i'm not really buying the usefulness of common graph tools because the layout depends on the data.

IMO Q has an specific and exact layout for the map.

That's when the map become useful

You know exactly where you are and you can trace a path on it.

Crumbs need to be in it, not a representation/summary of them.

Why insist on a graphical form otherwise? (ctrl+f doesn't work on images, so there must be some other plus to help review that search doesn't provide)

>>4802976

I think marker = person is too narrow

Also i'm not sure a marker isn't 'recycled' after a while

>>4803034

> 40.000ft = conspiracy risk

Avoiding it didn't really help, kek

> That is a feature that works against censorship, yes?

True but not helping us dig & RE_READ

Q insisted we should review the graphic and use that.

As other anons I went back to the 43 confirmed connections of #225

I'll try to make a summary of all possible thoughts I had and a todo list to work on.

I've read the "expand your thinking" pdf but I've mixed feelings about it. It can help us make connections and think but it's not directly related to charting the map. Might be wrong

general question for anons:

any throwaway live chat tool we can use?

mut be anon-approved obv.