>>4802844 pb notable.
>https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/107/hr2977/text
This bill was reintroduced several times. It has never been voted on. How notable is a bill that died before a vote?
>>4802844 pb notable.
>https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/107/hr2977/text
This bill was reintroduced several times. It has never been voted on. How notable is a bill that died before a vote?
maybe… except the President's ban on using Air Force planes does not prevent any of them from just traveling overseas on their own dime for whatever reason. Plus the NSA's reach is far. If they are being surveilled going to Brussels won't stop that.
That is fair, but if you are digging on space based weapons it might be good for you to also dig into the history, specificaly Verner Von Braun and his predictions in the 1970's about space-based weapons and his warnings about the shadow government's plan for that. This is public domain stuff. His predictions will blow your mind.
Nope. It only proves that the bill's author is a believer. Black projects are never going to be openly discussed or disclosed by any means. If Kucinich had specific information about this, and he disclosed it by writing a bill prohibiting it he would be in jail. Seriously, anon. This is proof of nothing and it is 18 years old. It is not notable.
This is a huge slide. This bill was rewritten, what ? 5 times? It was never voted on. The bill died almost 2 decades ago. It is proof of nothing. It discloses nothing. They can write bills on anything, anything at all. Most bills never make it to the floor for a vote.
Anons need to dig on classified information and the consequences for disclosing those things deemed secret for national security reasons. Any disclosure of secret programs is met with prosecution and jail time. Kucinich's bill is not proof of anything and your speculation is wild and baseless.