dChan
Anonymous ID: 58befe Jan. 18, 2019, 7:14 p.m. No.4813710   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3734 >>3760 >>3775 >>4060

Do Dems seek hi-tech solutions to border security to pay off campaign donations?

Fri, Jan 18, 2019

see 33:55 https://youtu.be/cb9FjF5TVME

 

''repost from lb; explains Dems' rationale for resisting Border Wall''

 

Tucker Carlson with Terry Turchie, Former FBI Depty Asst Director.

 

Tucker observes that Nancy Pelosi sees the solution to border security in a "quasi-magical, digital wall on the border," and asks TT whether he thinks this approach would be more effective than a wall.

 

Turchie says no, but gives reasons why Pelosi is saying that:

"The reason is simple: The Democratic Party is simply OWNED by the technocrats in Silicon Valley.'''

"I worked in Palo Alto, in counterintelligence & terrorism there and had all kinds of contacts….and you could see this developing then.

"Silicon Valley depends upon cheap labor; they loved the B1 visa program….'We can bring in people cheaper.'

"They own the democrats and the democrats who turn have to do things for them….

"[Dems like Obama, HRC & Feinstein] have a solid march out to Silicon Valley's dinners, and thousand-a-plate lunches, and all of these other things. They have to deliver in return."

"Silicon Valley is for the democrats is the "new Union." People scratch their heads and wonder…'What have the democrats done? Why did they abandon the mid-Western statees and all the people they represent?' Because they have no money anymore. Silicon Valley has the money."

 

Turchie goes on to say that Silicon Valley is "pumping their ideology into some of the people they're helping get elected. It's very very dangerous, because Silicon Valley…is completely wrapped around the axle fo the intelligence services, from the Chinese to the Russians–even to our friends….

 

Tucker: I've never heard anybody say what you just said–[that] pushing a digital solution to everything is in effect a payoff to their campaign contributors. But now that you say it out loud, it's so clearly true, I hope you keep saying it."….

 

Turchie says this kind of approach requires constant updating [and hence, an steady income stream for Silicon Valley companies].

 

Tucker: "We've been scammed for 20 years and it's only now just dawning on us!"

Anonymous ID: 58befe Jan. 18, 2019, 7:20 p.m. No.4813809   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3854

>>4813760

I haven't heard this argument advanced (that Dems are in debt to Silicon Valley and thus promote high tech solutions); I guess Tucker hadn't either. But it makes sense. Same thing high tech does in the schools: creating proprietary programs that they control and update.

Anonymous ID: 58befe Jan. 18, 2019, 7:43 p.m. No.4814133   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4280 >>4295

>>4813755

 

I am OP >>4813601.

 

First, I apologize for not reading 3rd part–end of bread, not linked, too hasty on my part. First two parts were kinda hard to read, lengthy, no time.

 

Appreciate your comments here.

 

So AET may be the director of operations.

 

Now, about that:

AET's role is still hard to determine.

Part 3 has Shane saying he witnessed the planning at AET but otherwise there's not much sauce in the Buzzfeed article. (And we know today just how dependable BF is!)

 

How do we know what this guy Shane said is true? I was in on the digg, figured AET (the dems) were more active than claimed. And that they probably donated the whole $750,000 for the project.

 

But at this point it's a claim. A very good lead for a new digg, tho.