>>4814344

kek! You gonna tell me this Pepe ain't a wammins?

>>4814372 lb

>>4814394

You clock guys care to disavow this fake shit in 6143 notables? Since when is a 90-degree angle part of clockfag analysis?

>>4812982 Shot heard round the world clocks

>>4814409

>picasso is the original kanye

kek. true, true.

>>4814442

>since clockfags said it was?

Do you have any sauce for that?

Any evidence besides snark?

>>4814559

2nd one looks like a set of pillow cases my mom used to have, with some loose picasso drawing on 'em, I don't remember which. Hand around flowers in a vase I think.

>>4814487

ah, got it.

legit clockfags never claimed 90-degree angles for anything

but the whole tool has pretty much been totally discredited by shills

bums me out, used to be cool means of comms

>>4814990

>understood, there seems to be new rules every day

they're not real "rules," it's shill nonsense

>I understood the original minute timestamp connected to a date

This still holds, but my suspicion is Q/POTUS stopped coding too much to this due to how degraded/discredited the tool got

Original rules:

-Q drops POTUS twats only

-timestamp minutes = minute on clock

-delta in minutes = minute on clock

-straight line connecting dates/minutes = clock connection

-clock connection + words/content in common = comms

>I'm working on a delta marker theory though, dealing with Q's confirmed delta markers

Cool, look forward to that, thanks