>>4814597 (previous)
Mossad or not, Webb is close to the actual physical evidence. I haven't heard anything he said refuted factually. If they are facts, it doesn't matter who tells them to you. Are there other facts he's leaving out – nobody's shown that either.
People complain that he doesn't draw conclusions. That's his strength: he lays out facts he finds interesting and lets you draw conclusions.
Wish they'd reopen Indian Point, there's no reason to close it. It's running just fine, it even just got recertified, but now that it's planned to close it the utility doesn't even want it open any more.
We should reprocess "spent" nuclear fuel, it's retarded that we don't. The concern is that breeder reactors (where they are used to generate more electricity, which also reprocesses the spent fuel rods) can produce enriched uranium.
I know Iran isn't allowed to have that, but we are. So what's the problem?
(1) this is why I am not a fan of Trump (or Obama) selling our crude oil or natgas on the world market. We should follow Eisenhower's plan of letting other countries exhaust their reserves, not exhausting our own.
(2) Nuke fuel reprocessing, molten-salt nuclear reactors, and fusion are the future. They could really solve this problem.
The press are starting to ask hard questions of the usual leftist suspects and are skeptical. They treat Trump with more respect.
If they can learn, be a bit patient with your SO. Just talk about cooking or sex or something with her instead.