>>4815881

Hey baker, good job on the notables. Really glad you included this one.

>>4815583 Tsar Nicholas II Stood in the Way of Jewish Global Dominance

It has really good info, a clear synopsis of a number of subjects intersecting which I've done a lot of study into: Bolsheviks, Biblical history/prophecy, Napolean's emancipation of the Jews & ensuing takeover of Europe/Anglosphere, & Marxism's attack on the family.

I encourage any anons not familiar with the subject of the Romanov family's execution or the Jewish role in the Bolshevik revolution to read it. It may seem out there at first, but the claims are all true and can be proven so if you do your own research. It's not all and only Jews involved in the enemy we fight, but it's an undeniable element that all patriots will eventually have to come to terms with in their search for truth. You can't fight what you can't see, and you can't see what you can't name.

>>4816205

>if we would've promoted nationalism in Russia, history would've been different

Yup. There's a series of podcasts – a very long one – on the Bolshevik revolution that will turn your stomach, the details of what was done to those poor people (Russians, Ukrainians, etc.). The Bolshevik Jews were pure evil. But the series is rich in historical detail, read directly out of original source material such as Red Cross reports, etc. Pretty sure he has transcripts too, with PDFs of the sauce. I can see if I can find links for you if you're interested. Knowing there's a baker that's willing to put it in notables, maybe I'll post some of it here from time to time.

>>4816155

You might guess from above that I support your including the Talmud dig, baker. The info aligns with my own study of the subject. I should tell you, tho, that there's been an anon spamming a lot of Talmud stuff last few days, here and in biblefags thread. That level of push can be shilling, but it can also just be being an intense autist (I'd know, kek). Hoping it's the latter ofc.

But if the muhjoo shills start a both-sides flame war, I don't want to have not given you the heads up.

That said, this is an unfounded assumption Anon:

>>4816427

>does so to cast a negative light on all jews.

You can't know Anon's motives for posting the information. It's baker's job to judge whether information is accurate and relevant, not to judge motives for wanting it shared, or to censor information for fear it will have an undesired effect. If a poster is a known shill, then we can assume malicious intent, but BO/BV has not posted hash histories indicating this Anon is a known shill.

>>4816557

>it's an important time in history that needs to be studied

Agreed. A number of critical pivot points in the past 300 yrs, and that's one of them, a big one.

>>4816538

>kek, are you telling on me?

lel

>>4816507

>take the word Jew from this and you have some real history

Evidence supports the vast majority of Bolsheviks were in fact ethnic Jews. The member of Cheka mentioned was Jewish. Can you refute those facts? If not, then the title of the article is accurate.