>>4816632 lb

Wew, I was almost convinced by your skillful use of ALL CAPS, but then it occurred to me you sidestepped the evidence I put up that Cheka (enforcement arm) was 80% Jewish. Lenin was also Jewish, and Trotsky, and the movement of course began with Jew Karl Marx.

But you're right that early Russian Bolshevism supporters weren't majority Jewish. My bad, was thinking Cheka. But they were still heavily for Zionism even in the beginning, there's that. And after the Bolsheviks' 80% Jewish Cheka started slaughtering and starving Christians, pretty sure non-Jewish support for Bolshevism fell off pretty precipitously. Other than the argument that it wasn't all and only Jews participating at every stage of the hostile take-over, can you deny the claim that Russian Bolshevism was a Jewish movement or that Cheka was 80% Jewish? Both are accepted as fact by anyone not constrained to downplay it for fear of being labeled an anti-semite.

http://www.orthodoxchristianbooks.com/articles/371/bolshevism-jews/

>>4816764, >>4816785

see:

>>4816776

And ty baker. They're gonna come at you hard for this, and not just today. Doesn't matter that you put the disclaimer in. Remember that, according to BO/BV, a lot of the seeming pro-JQ anons are really MOS/C_A nigs fanning the flames. I'm a real anon so my calling Jews out is just me doing the same search for truth the rest of us are doing (I'm on all the time, same IP as always). But I don't want you to be jerked around w/o understanding the field of play. If I posted JQ truth here, and support for your noting it, and didn't say the above then I'd be an asshat.

>>4816806

Yeah yeah, we know.

Jews dindu nuffin'

Eternal victims

One thing that confuses me. If that's the case, what's the harm in our researching the facts for ourselves? Won't it reveal you're correct? Why do you shill so fucking hard against it? Why is illegal everywhere but on this nation, and career suicide everywhere but this fucking board, even to question your victim narrative? If you're such victims, how do you even have the power to pull such draconian control off? Is it related to you having almost all the money in the world? How can you have all the money in the world, control all the banks, and still be helpless victims? Can someone please explain this glaring contradiction?

>>4816962

You're a good man.

Earnest and straight-shooting.

I have a lot of respect for you, baker.

Gonna tap out for the night.

You have a good one.

>>4816996

>BO and BV support all the JQ posters and have NEVER questioned their motives

That is incorrect.

BO posted this hash of a JQ poster as an example of a shill. And BV just posted these 3 recently. BO/BV have said again and again that their role as mods is to protect free speech, and to that end, to call out malicious posters regardless of content.

>>4817110

Oh shit, thanks. Yeah it matters, I won't use 'em (who wants leaf slime on their keyboard?) I grabbed 'em recently, but yeah, I see on the dates they're old. Jeez the nigs are still using the same stale memes from THAT long ago? Kek.

>>4817121

>well if you are correct i apologize

No worries, thanks for the olive branch.

>not how i recall the posts

You're probably recalling how, in general, BO/BV don't really call out anything, they don't censor speech of any kind. The only thing they really speak out against is a) demands for censorship and b) spam. Since we have a lot of anons that will be very vocal in wanting criticism of Jews/Israel censored, to the point of sometimes spamming ad nauseum, BO/BV have spoken out against that. But that's not a position for a particular type of speech, it's a position against spammed calls for censorship. I can't speak for them of course, this is just my observation. As you can see, when so-called "pro-JQ" anons spam the shit out of the board bread after bread, BO/BV call it out as spam too.

>>4816822

>to sday that the soviet secret police was EVER run by Jews is an absurd non starter not even worthy of debunking

Nice Appeal to Ridicule you've got there, but Anons aren't impressed with logical fallacies. This one looks suspiciously like you're conceding the point because you know it can't be debunked. But I try not to assign motives.

>how can such a small pop be in charge of everything evil and money and media and everything in the world?

Well, that's what we're here to figure out. But if you're wanting us to continue to buy this Big Lie ("who, little old us?") because it's too preposterous to imagine, you're too late. We're living it, we're leagues past pretending it's not happening. Are you saying the small handful of cabal controllers, including all the big banksters who are mostly Jewish, aren't controlling the world? Hasn't Q confirmed it's (((Roths))), and the Fed as major elements of cabal control?

I'll let you have the last word if you wanna keep spitting in the wind, I shoulda tapped out awhile ago. Wew!

>>4817290

Fucking SERVED.

KEK!