Anonymous ID: db4300 Jan. 19, 2019, 11:14 a.m. No.4822527   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2602 >>2754 >>2804

Could POTUS Use This Procurement to Fund The Wall?

 

Public Law 85-804

 

When needed "to facilitate the National Defense"

Prez can Procure funds, pre-pay contractors

Only needs to give Congress 60 days written notice

 

Key points:

  • Congress delegated its power of the purse

to Prez to use according to his Judgment

on what is necessary for Nat'l defense

  • Posse Comitatus argument is rendered moot

bc this would hire civilian contractors

 

History:

Is a Procurement Law, made in the time of Korean Law

Aug. 1958, Ike cited the law, not cited again till Hussein

1973, Congress amended, could pass statement of disapproval

1990, Removed provision (to streamline Gulf War)

 

Law has never been challenged in court, however…

2014, Hussein Presidential Memo stating that United Agency for Int'l Dev.

(funds many NGO's) could use the law "to indemnify USAID contractors

in Africa from claims, losses, or damages from exposure to Ebola in Africa"

(bc our national defense is tied to "humanitarian mandate")

 

Origins:

Law was lifted line-for-line from

1941 War Powers Act of 1941 passed by Congress Dec.17

enabled Roosevelt to push fwd WWII post Pearl Harbor

One change:

to facilitate prosecution of the War

''"to facilitate the National Defense"''

 

POTUS an also make use of additional law,

essentially the Mil version of Eminent Domain:

10 US Code Sec. 2663 Land Acquisition Authorities

"to force the sale of any remaining 700 miles of passable land

along the southern border which is still in private hands"

 

Sauce:

Podcast is suitable to share w/normies:

http://fash-the-nation.libsyn.com/ftn-focus-third-way-wall-positionism

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/2663

PDF: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjQotCHxvrfAhVGxIUKHeVaCscQFjAAegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gpo.gov%2Ffdsys%2Fpkg%2FSTATUTE-72%2Fpdf%2FSTATUTE-72-Pg972.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3rYtSjzGbKCL2uv_P-6S2Y

https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2010-title10/USCODE-2010-title10-subtitleA-partIV-chap159-sec2663

Anonymous ID: db4300 Jan. 19, 2019, 11:20 a.m. No.4822602   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4822530

Re: POTUS's use of language "Humanitarian Crisis"

see Hussein's use of this procurement law re: "Humanitarian mandate"

>>4822527

Could he be setting up the comparison

of if Congress let Hussein do it for Africans

why won't they let me do it for Americans/Migrants?

Anonymous ID: db4300 Jan. 19, 2019, 11:27 a.m. No.4822660   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>4822607

>4822631

Shills arguing with themselves

to create appearance of non-stop in-fighting

This anon looks forward to the day

when all of your subversive lying mouths are shut

Anonymous ID: db4300 Jan. 19, 2019, 11:36 a.m. No.4822777   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2792

>>4822756

You are correct. If you read 23 & Me's fine print, they've been selling/licensing/giving all the data to Pharma/Biotech from the start, for "research purposes". You sign a waiver to allow it when you agree to their terms.