>>482340

Possibilities: 1 or some of these

$20 million reached on the back of an event to funnel money to bad actors

20 million reached in terms of the hops out from people on this board

20 million docs in OIG collection

20 million docs processed from those taken from Langley

>>482382

Signal to Wikileaks?

Release imminent?

Q Post

>Stanislav Lunev.

>The BRIDGE.

>Payback for today.

Read two ways depending on who is doing the payback.

>>482416

Exactly. It is often what is not there, that is most telling at the detailed level.

We are not seeing funeral footage.

We are not seeing evidence from the crimescene.

We are not hearing opposing narratives, the narrative forced onto us is to drive away from the truth otherwise it could be questioned.

>>482440

Are the relevant Wikileaks cables a cover story?

>>482468

Cables describe (from recollection) Mueller transporting HUE as part of an investigation. So that's not a cover for trafficking?

Could the bridge and poisoning of the river be a reference to London? I know the original plot is D.C. but anyone notice a connection to recent London or UK references? Anthrax in the mail etc. Markel's leaks as an anon blogger that hit the news…

>>482496

This

>>482532

POTUS did put Vegas back into the narrative bringing up bump stocks.

>>482588

I remember that.

Think it was summer 1987.

Michael Ryan went Rambo.

Then they banned everything except shotguns and hand guns.

They did hand guns a few years later with Dunblane.

>>482609

Exactly.

Phase two is after the set up in phase one. Execution of set up.

>>482625

I doubt if prep was made and facts known that all those kids died in that school.

Massive trap if true.

CNN would be finished.

>>482630

No.

There is no route to UN Sec Gen for Obama.

Is it a signal he needs diplomatic immunity or asylum?

Will he claim is a political target?

>>482652

The selection process is subject to veto from the perm five. Hence, you don't get a member from the perm five.

>>482707

All I am saying is the five perm members have a veto, so you don't a have a sec gen from those countries.

Barry would never make it past a US veto unless Trump is not president.

>>482742

Great work anon!

But US would veto Barry.

UN sec gen has blanket diplomatic immunity?

Did Trump ask the other leaders to convince Barry they would let him 'think' he could be it?

That would be hilarious!

>>482760

BUT the US still has a veto.

>>482834

Remember, the US holds a veto over the nomination as do the other five. No nomination can go around the veto of any perm member.