>that little shit will get what's coming to him. He'll sing like a bird after a storm.
Is he trying to sound like a total turd on purpose? Is he part of setting up CNN? Might as well be, the optics are TERRIBLE especially with all the leaks.
>Whether you are right or wrong, that's the most pathetic lazy attempt at discrediting a point-by-point argument in history.
I thought it was a most informative post full of evidence. There is nothing in it that I want to discredit, except for the conclusion that 17 people died. I don't know how you can expose that much fakery, but not question the most important part of the case - the 17 counts of alleged homicide. If there are dead bodies, I haven't seen one. Why not? This was supposed to be a gun grab. If they had even 1 convincing image of an innocent child savagely murdered, it would have been much more powerful. We haven't seen it because it doesn't exist.
>Would it be easier to believe that the cabal killed 17 innocent students for their cause or that they paid to stash 17 people away from their family and friends for the rest of their lives?
While I think they would happily kill 17 people
just for entertainment, I think they wanted to control the narrative completely. The best way to do that is to pay EVERYONE in advance, and control every word that they say. Whatever it costs them to control the narrative, it's peanuts compared to the trillions of dollars that they print from thin air.