>>4826335

Sorry, if I am rude. But that's what the fucking problem with you idiots is all the time. It's not about the fucking Happenings. It's about getting your ass up, research yourself, dig yourself, post it here and let others dig on it too. And if it's relevant info, we can quickly weaponize it on Social Media. We had so many successful twitter attacks, even got actors fired for their pedo crap because MSM couldn't hide it anymore.

If Q would post the whole plan here, then the Deep State would obviously know all of our moves since they read here too. It's only obvious that Q wouldn't post any 100% legit info here. The only thing ever legt Q did say was: "Disinformation is necessary" and this is exactly what's happening right now. If we are confused about this whole thing, then the Deep State must be too. And that's the point.

>>4826408

You are correct. But also consider this: She is way too young to be President. And I am pretty sure that's the reason a lot of people are not gonna vote for her. She lacks life experience.

>>4826503

I never experienced this so far on Instagram, to be honest. It's possibly their shitty Instagram algorithm that detects some posts as bot activity and thus auto-bans/deletes accounts.

>>4826509

Filtered. Not gonna read your shit today.

Also, can someone post that code again to disable red text?

>>4826492

Dude. That was one hell of a slide. Kek.

POTUS and Q are fighting. But one anon posted the difference between a classical coup d'état and "Q d'état". A classical coup d'état would indeed be really fast and quick, revolutionary in that sense, but it wouldn't last long and quickly break apart. The form Q and Trump practice though is different. It's a slow re-structuring process, and as you can see, is already chaotic in itself, but doesn't lead to the complete disruption of the US. And that's why I definitely stick to Q and Trump, since such a slow revolution is also resulting in in a much longer lasting peace.