Playing hop-scotch again. Just 3 breads this time. <sigh>

>>4821455 (PB)

Your argument shows that you totally lack understanding of the scope of the problem. Here: https://youtu.be/LPjzfGChGlE <<== Understanding the reality of immigration. Six minutes to mastery.

https://youtu.be/bSaAg2qC-Hg <<== Three minutes – the shorthand version

Not another word out of you until you've watched these two videos, total time ~9 minutes.

>>4821596 (PB)

How much money we spend isn't the issue. What happens when your opponent won't sell you the supplies you need? Or sends you shitty steel + compromised electronics?

>>4821610 (PB)

Thumbs up. Someday we'll probably know, but we have no need to know his/her identity today.

>>4821853 (PB)

Actually, you can. As some recently learned, fire works wonders at curing stupidity. These are the people Pelosi wants in your neighborhood. Not hers … just yours.

>>4821658 (PB)

Just the breadth of those "old news stories" is convincing.

>>4821696 (PB)

I'm not buying that count without better sourcing and I don't think you should, either. We don't want to look as stupid as MSM, do we?>>4821763

>>4821766 (PB)

Don is only as well-informed as his advisors want him to be.

>>4821828 (PBP

Still, the marriage was illegal (consanguinity + polygamy) and was a means to immigration fraud.

>>4821574 (PB)

Well, they used to – until this fucker dropped the last one.

>>4822011 (PB)

This is un-sourced bullshit. Don't bite.

>>4822051 (PB)

Be a shame if the A/C broke, wouldn't it?

>>4822083 (PB)

My money is on "lied to".