>>4827504

>Kinda like the fake memo that so many pushed as legit, even though we all watched it be poster, admonished, and then removed

There's no excuse for fake shit to EVER make notables and then have to be removed later. Why the fuck can't we require notables be vetted & sauced?! No matter how many newfag plebbiters we get, as long bakers vet shit we don't look like asshats. You'll see bakers push for sauce awhile after an embarrassment, then it degenerates back to unsauced caps.

Caps aren't sauce.

Rando YT vids/podcasts aren't sauce.

Twats aren't sauce.

Muh I heard about this in the grocery aisle isn't sauce.

Only URL links that contain credible, official accounting of the primary data is sauce.

Baker (and anons, baker can't do it all) should actually vet it to make sure whatever is claimed in the post is actually present in the sauce.

We don't have to be dicks about it. Bakers work with what they're given. Just check notables and remind baker to ask for sauce if you see it's missing. Better yet, post it yourself and call baker's attention to it.

>>4827777

>Tweets can be sauce depending on context

-Still must have a URL to the twat itself, cap insufficient bc can be shooped easily

-If Twat is itself news, something funny DJT Jr. says, or something irritating Haberman says, then twat + URL of twat is sufficient

-If Twat is referencing big news, then that news itself should be sauced with a URL in the twat, unless the twatter account has office to represent the news (as in WH Press Sec account posting POTUS's letter to NP)

>There's a learning curve, and we always appreciate their efforts here.

While this is generally true, the patterns I speak of show in bakers that have been baking for us for months. Again, not trying to be a dick or advocating for being a dick, was just pointing out facts and suggested way to make things better.

>People usually just need to be reminded instead of told what to do.

Is that not what I asked anons to do?

>>4827912

>getting your ass handed to you on the cultural front.

Not really. The people in power still have as much power as ever, but we're winning the culture war down here at the grass roots level. More and more are waking up to our dispossession and the empty promises of Multi-Kulti Globo-homo policies. It's a beneath the surface ground swell bc, singly, they can still smack us down. But when we speak as a group, our voice gets louder and louder and more and more committed with each insult we have to endure. POTUS's winning the Presidency was only the beginning. We shouldn't take our winning for granted, we should keep pushing and redpilling as hard as we can, but neither should we be discouraged with surface-level shows of strength by the Establishment. Their base is crumbling. They didn't import enough 3rd worlders fast enough to combat the waking of the founding stock of our nations. It's slow, but it's habbening. Don't you worry.

>>4828021

Thanks patriot.

>>4828021, >>4828033, >>4828045

Baker

maybe also add this:

Syrian Observatory for Human Rights

For the Globalist Propaganda angle

http://www.syriahr.com/en/?p=113081

>>4828099

maybe expand Idlib note:

>>4828105

For extra sauce, and more reading

(even tho globalist propaganda kek)

>>4828004, >>4828021, >>4828105 Russians launching air strikes in Idlib, Syria

>>4828123

You want us to believe head of the CIA, GHWB was a whitehat?

Nah

>>4828163

Well truth is I never trust anything I have seen and handled up close and personal. He might be a whitehat for all I know. I keep all my options open so I stay open to ever changing data.

>>4828182

>have seen

*haven't seen