>>4828259, >>4828222, >>4828345

Hey News Aggregator Anon,

This is a genuine appeal I'm hoping you'll take to heart, since you really are a font of useful info. Would you consider changing the way you interact with bakers? The level of general abuse you level at them is so unacceptable it verges on shilling. Telling them to fuck off, choke on cocks, that they should be fired, the worst fucking baker ever, comped, a shill, and on and on. We've all seen it. Anons and bakers have asked you to take your concerns to Meta, and BO/BV have told you again and again that notables are bakers' discretion, that not all news stories will be selected. BV even made a Current Events thread to contain all your posts, and you even shat on him for that too.

If you're determined to make a meaningful difference here in General, you might have better luck choosing 1 - 3 posts per bread that you feel are very important to make notables, and if baker doesn't choose them (and anons haven't nominated them) then present a request to baker in a courteous, respectful manner with reasoning why you think these particular notes are important. And then if – and when – baker denies your request, as will inevitably happen, fucking take it like a man and don't whine like a bitch faggot about it. There's only so much abuse anyone is willing to participate in without pushing back. When known shill spam posters abuse our free speech policy here too egregiously, BO/BV will put them on a time-out. I wouldn't be at all surprised that, if you continue to abuse bakers, bakers themselves don't just decide to put your ass on a time-out by not including any of your posts unless they're nominated by another anon – someone who's NOT acting like a total douchebag. Then maybe you'd appreciate the service bakers provide and show a little humility and team-spirit. I can speak for this anon in saying I do appreciate the service you provide, which is why I'm hoping you'll chill out with the anger-sperging so you don't get yourself sidelined.

Food for thought.

Godspeed.

>>4828549

Baker, notable

>>4828345 Chief Nurse Of British Army First Person To Arrive at Skripal Scene

I think this one's worth including as well, since the Skripal case is so tied to the political games Q makes drops about. It also references a new name in the game, which is good for autists to have in the back of their minds as the game moves forward. Because of that, the above post contains more substance for a research effort IMO than the one about Syria condemning blah blah blah. Everyone's always whining about something over there, today's "condemnation" isn't necessarily big news, but I also don't know enough about the topic generally to distinguish whether it is or isn't.

>>4828639

>You really need to read the welcome message seriously go read it.

If you only knew how ironic this statement was

And I just got done nominating one of your fucking posts too. Look, asshat, it's as unpatriotic as it gets to treat fellow anons as fuck-pillows. You have your reasons, others have theirs. If you can't represent yours in a civil, coherent way, or agree to disagree, then you are not an ally to us, but one of the unfortunate weights we have to bear as we proceed to MAGA as best we can anyway.

>The fact you have gone to such trouble to track what I do outs you as a possible clown

Dude, it's not hard to fucking track what you do. I go to the trouble of noticing patterns bc autist, and I go to the trouble of speaking up for what works and is just bc patriot.

And you, anon, are a gigantic asshat.

GFYS

>>4828856

Oh phew! Was just about to say, 'but I do dig!' Just yesterday, in fact, I spent a couple hours putting up a series of dig posts that baker didn't agree were notable. I made my case, but baker's mind was unchanged. I let it go and thanked baker anyway.

Wasn't easy, tbh. None of us likes not getting our way, but you sack up and move on.

And yeah, Newsfag has been a problem for months. I thought I'd try a genuine appeal to reason with him, but you saw how that went kek. Hey, at least I tried!

>>4828913

KEK!!

Although I wonder whether it just correlates to time of year. To assign it to the shut-down we'd want to compare to same time last year.