dChan
Anonymous ID: f7c0ae Jan. 19, 2019, 7:06 p.m. No.4829013   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9055

Former Israeli MOS high ranked officer: If Putin will collude in the Israeli election, he will probably collude in favor of Netanyahu

are we witnessing a fake narative injection, a mirror of what is going on with potus?

 

The man who is responsible for the claim is Haim Tomer, a 30 year MOS veteran, who has reached a high rank in the organization. This man was involved in a failed (now out of business) Israeli cyber security startup called "the 5th dimension", in that startup company 2 other high ranked individuals were involved - Ehud Barak (corrupt israeli PM who is logged in Epstein lolita express flight logs, was involved with the Blackcube cyber company and was funded by the cabal wexner fund) and Benny Ganz (former IDF chief of staff, a suspected israeli deep state stooge, funded by the cabal Wexner fund).

 

Looks like MOS are preparing to mirror the potus russian fiasco and are preparing the israeli sheeple for a "pro Netanyahu Russian collusion. This happens while the criminal investigations that the Israeli deep state is running against Netanyahu are starting to crack and it seem more and more as a witch hunt.

 

could bibi be part of the plan?

 

We know that many formerly leveraged leaders are part of this global plan. Attached q crumb is relevant.

 

Source (use google translate):

 

https://www.globes.co.il/news/article.aspx?did=1001268582

 

as a side note, one of the main investors in that "5th dimention" company was a russian oligarch VICTOR VEXELBERG that was involved in the Mueller witch hunt.

 

>Mueller Investigation of Russian Oligarch Sinks Israeli Predictive Analytics Company

 

https://www.calcalistech.com/ctech/articles/0,7340,L-3752186,00.html

Anonymous ID: f7c0ae Jan. 19, 2019, 7:10 p.m. No.4829054   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9076 >>9084 >>9090 >>9094 >>9137 >>9701

>>4828984

>>4828983

>>4829042

 

jewish talmud says: you suck David's balls.

 

this link debunks all your shill garbage:

 

http://talmud.faithweb.com/

 

no wonder you are so afraid.

 

oh wait, what's this? all your garbage is taken from the "book" called "talmud unmasked"!

 

>talmud unmasked, a book published in 1892 by Justinas Bonaventure Pranaitis (1861–1917).

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Talmud_Unmasked

 

The author is the same clown that was exposed as a complete fraud in the Beilis trial.

He was brought over as an "expert", and got completely exposed as a fraud:

 

>One prosecution witness, presented as a religious expert in Judaic rituals, was a Catholic priest, Justinas Pranaitis from Tashkent, well known for his antisemitic 1892 work Talmud Unmasked. Pranaitis testified that the murder of Yushchinsky was a religious ritual, associating the murder of Yushchinsky with the blood libel, a legend believed by many Russians at the time.

 

>Pranaitis' credibility rapidly evaporated when the defense demonstrated his ignorance of some simple Talmudic concepts and definitions, such as hullin,[1]:p.215 to the point where "many in the audience occasionally laughed out loud when he clearly became confused and couldn't even intelligibly answer some of the questions asked by my lawyer."[3]

 

>A Beilis Defense Committee advisor, a writer named Ben-Zion Katz, suggested countering Father Pranaitis with questions like "When did Baba Bathra live and what was her activity" which he described as the equivalent of asking an American "Who lived at the Gettysburg Address?" There were enough Jews in the court for the resultant laughter to negate Pranatis' value to the prosecution.[1]:pp.214-216

 

KEK!

 

>A Tsarist secret police agent is quoted, reporting on Pranaitis' testimony, as saying: Cross-examination of Pranaitis has weakened evidentiary value of his expert opinion, exposing lack of knowledge of texts, insufficient knowledge of Jewish literature. Because of amateurish knowledge and lack of resourcefulness, Pranaitis' expert opinion is of very low value.

 

KEK!

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menahem_Mendel_Beilis

 

let the shill kvetching begin!

Anonymous ID: f7c0ae Jan. 19, 2019, 7:30 p.m. No.4829303   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9330 >>9339

>>4829174

>>4829193

>>4829202

>>4829253

 

this link below that you haven't even opened debunks it:

 

http://talmud.faithweb.com/

 

no wonder you are so afraid.

 

You know what's funny? that your book is repeating the same garbage that appeared in the "book" called "talmud unmasked"! in the 19th century

 

>talmud unmasked, a book published in 1892 by Justinas Bonaventure Pranaitis (1861–1917).

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Talmud_Unmasked

 

The author is the same clown that was exposed as a complete fraud in the Beilis trial.

 

He was brought over as an "expert", and got completely exposed as a fraud:

 

>One prosecution witness, presented as a religious expert in Judaic rituals, was a Catholic priest, Justinas Pranaitis from Tashkent, well known for his antisemitic 1892 work Talmud Unmasked. Pranaitis testified that the murder of Yushchinsky was a religious ritual, associating the murder of Yushchinsky with the blood libel, a legend believed by many Russians at the time.

 

>Pranaitis' credibility rapidly evaporated when the defense demonstrated his ignorance of some simple Talmudic concepts and definitions, such as hullin,[1]:p.215 to the point where "many in the audience occasionally laughed out loud when he clearly became confused and couldn't even intelligibly answer some of the questions asked by my lawyer."[3]

 

>A Beilis Defense Committee advisor, a writer named Ben-Zion Katz, suggested countering Father Pranaitis with questions like "When did Baba Bathra live and what was her activity" which he described as the equivalent of asking an American "Who lived at the Gettysburg Address?" There were enough Jews in the court for the resultant laughter to negate Pranatis' value to the prosecution.[1]:pp.214-216

 

KEK!

 

>A Tsarist secret police agent is quoted, reporting on Pranaitis' testimony, as saying: Cross-examination of Pranaitis has weakened evidentiary value of his expert opinion, exposing lack of knowledge of texts, insufficient knowledge of Jewish literature. Because of amateurish knowledge and lack of resourcefulness, Pranaitis' expert opinion is of very low value.

 

KEK!

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menahem_Mendel_Beilis

 

let the shill kvetching begin!

 

P.S. What is funny that I have issues with the talmud, but none of them are your shill fake and gay crap.

 

>>4829221

 

translation: more shill tears.

Anonymous ID: f7c0ae Jan. 19, 2019, 7:52 p.m. No.4829577   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9592 >>9599 >>9603 >>9604

>>4829519

>>4829519

>>4829567

 

still running away from this?

 

this link debunks all your shill garbage:

 

http://talmud.faithweb.com/

 

no wonder you are so afraid.

 

oh wait, what's this? all your garbage is taken from the "book" called "talmud unmasked"!

 

>talmud unmasked, a book published in 1892 by Justinas Bonaventure Pranaitis (1861–1917).

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Talmud_Unmasked

 

The author is the same clown that was exposed as a complete fraud in the Beilis trial.

He was brought over as an "expert", and got completely exposed as a fraud:

 

>One prosecution witness, presented as a religious expert in Judaic rituals, was a Catholic priest, Justinas Pranaitis from Tashkent, well known for his antisemitic 1892 work Talmud Unmasked. Pranaitis testified that the murder of Yushchinsky was a religious ritual, associating the murder of Yushchinsky with the blood libel, a legend believed by many Russians at the time.

 

>Pranaitis' credibility rapidly evaporated when the defense demonstrated his ignorance of some simple Talmudic concepts and definitions, such as hullin,[1]:p.215 to the point where "many in the audience occasionally laughed out loud when he clearly became confused and couldn't even intelligibly answer some of the questions asked by my lawyer."[3]

 

>A Beilis Defense Committee advisor, a writer named Ben-Zion Katz, suggested countering Father Pranaitis with questions like "When did Baba Bathra live and what was her activity" which he described as the equivalent of asking an American "Who lived at the Gettysburg Address?" There were enough Jews in the court for the resultant laughter to negate Pranatis' value to the prosecution.[1]:pp.214-216

 

KEK!

 

>A Tsarist secret police agent is quoted, reporting on Pranaitis' testimony, as saying: Cross-examination of Pranaitis has weakened evidentiary value of his expert opinion, exposing lack of knowledge of texts, insufficient knowledge of Jewish literature. Because of amateurish knowledge and lack of resourcefulness, Pranaitis' expert opinion is of very low value.

 

KEK!

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menahem_Mendel_Beilis

 

let the shill kvetching begin!