People always try to explain things in terms and concepts they understand, first.
For many, particularly those who have only heard mention of Q or the occasional statement - they find Q easier to understand as just another larp/troll.
Others, familiar with insiders and government data projects will see Q as a sort of means of harnessing the public or trying to train/calibrate an AI.
For me… I see it a little differently. Q is speaking how I often speak to people 'asleep' to the truth, even when I explain it to them. Staged messages in a bottle, so to speak. The bottles all reference each other. Some are easier to understand, some have a meaning that changes depending on what the state of current events are and what order you are reading the messages in. Going from message 1 to 5 to 6 may give a slightly different reading than message 8 to 12 to 5, though both readings are correct, and events will guide you to read in both of those orders.
Except Q has far more resources than I do, is likely older/has more experience, and is not working alone.
Q is not polling us to really research anything for him or the Q team. They have it all, already. They are giving us some pointers to help us understand ahead of time, as well as to serve as a sort of handshake - an exchange of trust to show that they are aware of the problems we've noticed (some of us having bigger or smaller pieces of the picture) and to give us reason to take note of the messages in said bottles.
Q is the arbiter of a philosophy or decree in regard to truth and justice. Or… Has presented himself as such and given me reason to believe he is being truthful.