Ty baker!
>>4831738 lb
Was also this in notables re: 23 and Me's Data Sharing earlier today (pb):
>>4826021 pharmafag on 23 and me
>>4831759 lb
>Do not twist Q's drops for your own warped beliefs.
I didn't twist Q's words, I quoted them to mean exactly their explicit meaning: "study Nazism,"
-ism meaning the entire ideology & events surrounding "Nazi" phenomena, which is short for National Socialism, a polito/economic means of organizing society. Nothing twisted in that.
>for your own warped beliefs
I listed a bunch of facts which can be researched and verified, and provided a compendium source for anons to see for themselves, that is not mere "beliefs."
You, on the other hand, list a bunch of rando associations of Nazi's with propaganda techniques and Muslims, provide no coherent narrative or sauce for your claims.
Take this last claim:
>Yes, there was even a moslem SS unit (Himmler inspected them. Photos taken, films of concentration camps by US Veterans.
What are you saying with this fact, even if it's true? I also said that Hitler wasn't exclusionary to only Germans, but had Jews working with him. He had members of many other nations, ethnicities and even faiths working with him. The "Axis powers," aka nations allied w/Hitler against Bolshevik expansion were numerous and world-wide, not just the 3 big meanies we're taught about.
It sounds like you're trying to use the logical fallacy of guilt by association. Hitler was associated with Moslems, therefore Mustache Man Bad. Other than that little twist to the standard cabal narrative, everything is the exact slander we've always been taught.
And what the fuck kind of bullshit is this?
>The Nazis used women to Out-populate other races. The Third Reich's aggressive population policy encouraged women to bear as many "Aryan" children as possible.
How else do you have healthy replacement population as a nation but for women to have babies? How is that "using women?" kek.
Italy, Hungary, Russia and many other nations have begun to reinstitute incentives for young couples to have kids, all as a means to combat the plummeting of our birth rate due to Marxist programming and financial insecurity. Same was happening in Weimar Germany when Hitler came into power.
>The NAZIS set fire to 1,004 paintings and sculptures and 3,825 watercolours, drawings and prints in the courtyard of the Berlin Fire Department
These were works of total smut pornography and subversive texts, shoved down the throats of a people by a hostile foreign people bent on destroying the German, Christian culture. Removal of these materials wasn't done to the people, they were 'glad' for it. They wanted this imposed filth out of their lives and away from their children. Would anyone here really and truly cry salty tears if children's books such as "My Two Dads" were thrown in the GTFO heap?
>Nazi officials used extensive propaganda, carefully crafted to appeal when necessary to more general national, economic, and social goals.
Yeah, it's called advocating for yourself and what you think is right. Oooooh, sounds scary.
>Armenian Holocaust, was the Ottoman government's systematic extermination & genocide of 1.5 million Armenians
I'm sorry, where's Hitler's responsibility in this?
Everything about this Muh Nazi's narrative is an upside down pile of lies, along with all the other lies we've been told, and the people are waking to it. But good on ya for trying. Hey, you made notables on the back of my genuine and truthful contribution, bc we fair and balanced. And that's fine, cuz the truth's on our side.
Anecdotal, personal testimony.
There are so many of these that have been proven false.
I don't know about this particular one, but this kind of witness testimony wouldn't be enough to convict someone in a court of law without accompanying objective material evidence. It sounds convincing, as all good stories do. It's filled with imagery and emotional appeal, things people can relate to, their fears and resentments.
But that doesn't make it true.
For every one of these personal accounts there are hundreds of cross-referenced, corroborating official docs that say otherwise. The Germans were meticulous record-keepers, but it's not just their records it's all manner of agencies, vendors, etc.
And for far too many of these personal accounts, evidence can be found of some ulterior motive to telling the tale in the way the cabal wants it told – financial or otherwise.
It's called fake news. We're hip to it now.
>but both my parents did it, so I essentially know mine
I'm a little jelly tbh. I'd really like to have mine done but it's not worth the risk. And I already have a pretty good idea of my ancestry. I'm a Euro mutt as most Americans are, but my ancestral countries are all super nationalist which I find hilarious. Apple didn't far from that tree now did it?
Ty NWB, hope you have a nice shift fren
Yeah we all know about the Muh Experiments Muh Atrocity stories.
But who's telling the stories?
Your nih.gov sauce,
National Institutes of Health?
You mean the Medical Establishment in bed with Rockefellers and Roths?
I'm sure they're as trustworthy as CNN
How do we know that a government agency in bed with the Roths isn't just giving us a bunch of fake news?
Do you any sauce for this that references evidence besides anecdotal, personal testimony either of so-called victims that stood to gain financially in reparations or from so-called torturers whose confessions were actually extracted via real, documented torture?
>Pseudo-medical experiments were conducted in many camps and on a wide scale. The Nazis deliberately destroyed the records of these activities, hence the research which is being done today is based on the surviving remnants of the documentary evidence, the statements made by the organisers of these experiments, the testimonials given by victims and their medical examinations.
How do they know records were deliberately destroyed? The fact that none exist? There are no records that I ate an entire box of tide pods either. Does that mean I did and destroyed the records I did it?
>the testimonials given by victims and their medical examinations.
None of this is actual evidence. It is witness testimony that is spurious given the means in which it's collected.
I understand how to access the "evidence" you're providing, but I'm saying it is insufficient to prove the claims levied against the Third Reich.
These were false confessions because they were extracted using documented torture interrogation techniques. Anyone who has studied the subject knows this to be true.
Can you prove otherwise?
>Must be another low IQ millennial or camel piss drinking goat humping hamas, cair moslem brother hood or skin head shill.
Oh I forgot, you're not interested in actual argument or truth-seeking, just attempts to silence debate using Appeal to Ridicule and Ad Hominem fallacies.
I believe we've well established just what game you're playing, toiletboi. I'm out.
G'night anons