Updated Timeline for Alabama Election Fraud DIGG (AET, Morgan, Dickerson, Shane, and WaPo): Who really wrote the damning report??

1-20-19, repost, no baker

''Below is an update of the timeline from >>4816012 pb plus article CAPS: one from Morgan (posted pb but hard to read) and WaPo (new post). This info is complex; tried to make it accurate but plz read with care.''

DEC 19: Scott Shane publishes the NYT "Secret Experiment" article indirectly referenced in Post 2635. Describes Project Birmingham but makes no mention about the role of AET, although Shane knew it in Sept (see below).

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/19/us/alabama-senate-roy-jones-russia.html

DEC 27: Buzzfeed publishes a story about Scott Shane being at a Sept 2018 conducted by AET, where Shane learns that that AET ran the anti-GOP fake bot campaign.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/craigsilverman/alabama-dirty-tricksters-invited-a-new-york-times-reporter

DEC 27 & 28: Sputnik runs 2 stories: first one discusses how New Knowledge sometimes mistakes real people for trolls; second one reports on Buzzfeed's claim of having a New Knowledge report that proves election meddling

https://sputniknews.com/analysis/201812271071023951-Company-Meddling-Report-Smear-Critics-Russian-Bots/

https://sputniknews.com/us/201812281071079929-New-Knowledge-Brags-Affecting-Vote/

JAN 2: After the shit hits the fan, AET's sub-contractor, Jonathon Morgan, protests that his company only conducted a small experiment, nothing designed to throw an election.

https://medium.com/@jonathonmorgan/social-media-and-the-alabama-special-election-c83350324529

JAN 6: WaPo obtains a 12-page doc titled "Project Birmingham," whose authorship is in question (same doc as Buzzfeed's? seems to be). Contains damning evidence that seems to show that this project was to throw an election, not just to test the "Russian bot" effect.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/secret-campaign-to-use-russian-inspired-tactics-in-2017-alabama-election-stirs-anxiety-for-democrats/2019/01/06/58803f26-0400-11e9-8186-4ec26a485713_story.html?utm_term=.3d435fdc9b0b

JAN 11: In an interview, NYT author Shane "forgets" that AED organized Project Birmingham; implies it was done by Morgan/Diresta/New Knowledge. No mention of AED.

https://www.wnycstudios.org/story/democrats-dirty-tricks-alabama-senate-race

RECENT POSTS ON ALABAMA DIGG

>>4826795 Here’s The After-Action Report From the Alabama Senate Disinformation Campaign 1-19-19

>>4816012 Scott Shane admits that AET directed Project Birmingham in Dec but says nothing about it in Jan interview

>>4812856….Trying to make sense Of The Alabama Controversy (Parts 1,2,3)

>>4833651

Still here, but retiring soon….not night shift tomorrow yet

>>4833672

oh dear.

>>4833675

thx, fren, and watch out for sunburn.

>>4833687

We're lucky we even have bakers, anon. This one stepped in for ghost baker.

>>4833697

I hope so, anon. I transcribed the speech she gave last month from the English subtitles. It was "telecast" on Facebook; French MSM would not carry.

>>4833733

And name me one George Washington capable of birthing a child, anon. Such unintelligent comparisons is what elicited the other anon's critique.

>>4833742

Don't forget just-before-dawn shift.

>>4833789

would appreciate notable for ongoing Alabama election fuckery DIGG

>>4833587 Updated Timeline for Alabama Election Fraud DIGG (AET, Morgan, Dickerson, Shane, and WaPo): Who really wrote the damning report??

>>4833820

Yes,

notable

from PB

>>4833842

Thx, and also for baking, baker shortage acute

>>4833870

"DAVOS DARKENING"

Hurrah, hurrah! Calls for an extension of National Popcorn Day!

>>4833883

Simplicity wins, anon! Thx.

>>4833887

Notable

and appalling

>>4833901

Can someone explain to me why you are posting a two month old story?

>>4833916

I'm not sure what POTUS is hinting at in this strangely-worded tweet. Odd that he indicates she made some sort of written offer–which he accepted–but which he is now not necessarily accepting. Hints at his powers as POTUS to do things that are not generally acceptable for others to do–like break a contract. Pelosi would like to think she has that kind of power, but she doesn't. Is this a reminder?

>>4833996

Is this old or new? If new, I've got to start collecting them. These seem to come out constantly these days….normalization of blood drinking.

>>4834012

Make the shills pull their weight, anon!

>>4834014

Might consider putting a question mark on the end, without further sauce:

>>4833887 Phone Number on AZ Human Trafficking Billboards Tied to Clinton Foundation?