>>4835134

eveyone note: the linked post is a low IQ anon thinking he can be the board police.

Listen, fine, write your reviews. We all do. But only post occasionally. Take it from me a lot of times I post too soon. I regret it.

Most of the time I craft a long response and then I say 'ya, let's just archive this response. I won't really post this., becuase I kind of know it's a shill.' or like the one you linked to with the wordpress sauce for who was on the Airforce Juncket bus.

Please, spare the board. You may be right, that's fine. But it's a research board. Some breads 97 or mor percent is crap and you can't comment on every shill or you clog the breads.

>>4835197

>56c075

wow, you gonna tag me again for giving you a good warning?

what is low IQ about saying to not clog breads with needless commentary?

you will get yourself banned if you keep this up, just a prediction.

>>4835226

bread bully don't you have more misspellings to do before this bread is done? I will not respond again but you knew I had to make just one more when you personally tell me to 'shut up'.

your power of persuasion is amazing. I am so convinced, now, that you are bully shilling that, yes, I will not again respond to you again this bread because, well, you seem to be toxic.