Hey baker, just getting on, I can take it.
Will assume kitchen duties from time of this post,
but if when you return you want to keep going,
that's no problem, I'll just gather & share notes.
Confirming handoff?
Ty for baking
See image of Calif. State Flag w/bear
>you got backup if needed, baker
I think I need it.
I'll do what I can if last resort but I'm having internet connectivity issues today
Confirming handoff?
Can you explain where the article is factually incorrect anon? ty -current baker
Agreed. This is an honest assessment.
We can't have certainty about all things,
sometimes you have to suspend judgment
and keep an open mind as data comes.
This reads as dishonest to me.
Unsauced innuendo devoid of detail
is a subversive's way of casting suspicion
while avoiding accountability for false statements
Those woke to the JQ understand it's not at all Jews, that there are many, many individuals of Jewish heritage (&/or religion) that have good intentions and can be valuable allies. Someone who tries to make a wedge issue out of Jared Kushner is most likely a shill trying to paint our movement as a bunch of unhinged, racist antisemites.
When making judgments about larger trends, we look at average group behavior over time.
When making judgments about individuals, we look at that individual's behavior over time, as well as surrounding trends that indicate probability. But to any rational person, actual individual behavior is always weighted much more heavily than surrounding probabilities.
Example: Person A is very tall and comes from an athletic family. Trends would suggest enjoys/good at basketball. Behavior shows lack of interest or ability. Conclusion: Not an athlete for now, but open to new data in future.
Example: Person B is of ethnicity known for subversive group behavior and has family involved in crimes. Behavior: no evidence of subversion/crime, trusted by someone we trust. Conclusion: ''not a bad guy now, but open to more data in the future."
THIS is how real anons think. We're not just rabid halfwits that hate entire groups of ppl for no good reason simply for the pleasure of experiencing the emotion of hate. That is a slander put on us to dissuade ppl from looking at the facts of group behavioral trends and allowing those patterns to help inform their decisions – HELP inform them, not make them absent any other evidence.
Fair enough, and sorry for implying you were shilling/dishonest. Was more using just the words in your post as an example to make the larger point about how we Not All Jews, & how to take general innuendo w/a grain of salt until you've looked into the facts of things.
>I have better things to do than type for an hour to explain a simple point like Kushner was a bad apple but probably isn't anymore.
Understood, agreed.