Obvious shills prove Q 24/7.
Should Anons engage shills?
"— Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page, who was neck-deep in Spygate, was said to have given lawmakers eye-opening (and cooperative) testimony in July when she appeared before a House committee following an appearance by former lover and FBI No. 2 counterintelligence official Peter Strzok. Her testimony is what likely led to this declassification."
https://thenationalsentinel.com/2018/09/18/as-potus-trump-orders-fisa-docs-declassified-heres-what-to-look-for/
o7
Be careful predictions, rumors, lying shills..
Be careful lying shills.
"Nunes, California Republican, wrote in his letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions that “in this instance, it’s clear that basic operating guidance was violated.”
Fox News reported further:
Nunes cited the Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide (DIOG), which was created by the bureau and approved by the Justice Department, to say he believed the FBI violated procedures requiring verified and documented evidence in applications to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
An Oct. 2011 version of the operations guide states that the “accuracy of information contained within FISA applications is of utmost importance… Only documented and verified information may be used to support FBI applications to the court.”
https://thenationalsentinel.com/2018/03/02/nunes-fbi-may-have-violated-criminal-statutes-in-alleged-fisa-court-abuses/
https://www.scribd.com/document/372746970/Nunes-to-Sessions-FBI-may-have-violated-criminal-statutes-in-Carter-Page-FISA-application
Obvious shills prove Q 24/7.
"What was the point of filing impeachment art if Ryan was going to reject?
Known beforehand?
Optics.
Think logically.
Could Sessions publicly challenge [RR] w/o creating a dilemma?
What events would immediately transpire if Sessions challenged [RR]?
Would it immediately demonstrate that Sessions must be aware of key Mueller facts?
Facts (or failure of duty) that he cannot possibly ‘know’ if recused?
Facts (a case) he is suppose to be recused from?
Think logically.
One challenge to [RR] would immediately trigger attacks to remove Sessions given his clear involvement in receiving information re: a case he is fully recused from.
Who does Huber [directly] report to?
Is it normal [RR] is side-stepped re: Huber CoC?
Why is this important?
Why did Sessions recuse?
Is the LEFT attacking Sessions?
What advantage(s) exist based on this setup?
POTUS publicly expresses his anger re: his recusal?
Do you believe POTUS would allow a complete takeover of his DOJ if nothing was being done behind the scenes to hold people accountable?
When POTUS states “the swamp is being drained” do you believe it?
When POTUS states “it’s happening” do you believe it?
Do you believe POTUS would allow Sessions & [RR] to run HIS DOJ if something wasn’t being done to his liking?
LOGICAL THINKING.
Clickbait derails logical thought.
Think for yourself.
Trust yourself.
Mueller investigating POTUS’ Tweets for obstruction?
You have a front row seat.
Enjoy the show.
Q"
"Blunt & Direct Time.
Adam Schiff is a traitor to our country.
Leaker.
NAT SEC.
EVIL.
Tick Tock.
Hope the $7.8mm was worth it.
Enjoy the show.
Q"
"Ask yourself a (simple) logical question…
Why are the majority of 'Q' attacks by "PRO_MAGA" supporters coming from AJ [MOS backed] and/or AJ known associates?
Why are we a threat to them?
Why not simply publish an original picture +/- 1,2,3 secs to establish credibility?
Why was this done in the past?
We knew this type of "attack" was coming.
PREDICTABLE.
FAKE NEWS.
ATTACKS WILL ONLY INTENSIFY.
Q"
Be careful lying shills, predictions, rumors.
Racism is stupid.
Racism is stupid.
shills are stupid.
Racism is stupid.
shills are stupid.
nancy and chuck are stupid.
Obvious shills prove Q 24/7.
shills are stupid.
If Q was fake, would they be here?
shills = Q proof.
shills are stupid fighting Q, instead proving Q.
Biased?