>>4843496 pb
You didn't use numbers.
You didn't understand the point of what I was saying. I was talking about the crazy number stuff that people seem to like so much.
And then I said, explain the lack of FISA declas - BASED ON THE CRAZY NUMBER STUFF.
The crazy number stuff doesn't explain the big stuff, like why no fisa declas.
You aren't even on point. You're talking about arrests. I'm talking about FISA declas. FISA declas comes before arrests. What is the number based reason for no FISA declas?
"making sure the majority who are sheep are also safe."
No one has adequately pointed out the dangers to the "majority who are sheep". It always seemed like a flimsy excuse, a false justification for not doing something, basically, fulfill the major campaign promises we want fulfilled - lock her up and drain the swamp.