Theory on the significance of Q's confirmed delta markers:
[0] = POTUS and Q are together
[1] = Message Confirming Q or Crumbs
[5] = Message Related to Crumbs
[10] = Delta Test with Message
[15] = Delta Test (comms test)
[1 year delta] = some events occur a year after Q informed anons about it, or are reoccurring yearly
(example of an event occurring a year after Q informed anons about it was "Flynn is safe")
(example of an event reoccurring yearly is the camp david pen pics)
"Wind the clock w/ all markers" seems to indicate the "Clock" is a DELTA COUNTER, using the confirmed DELTA MARKERS of [0], [1], [5], [10], [15], and [1 year] for COMMS
IMO, THE CLOCK IS ESSENTIALLY A METAPHORICAL STOPWATCH
*Notes:
-
just a theory based off confirmed deltas, AND HOW THEY ARE USED BY Q AND POTUS
-
these deltas are in units of MINUTES, but anything less than a [1] delta is a [0] delta
(crumb #2140 for example confirms this)
-
a delta can be between a crumb and a tweet/retweet, between tweets/retweets, or between crumbs and crumbs
(this includes tweets that correct misspelling, which also matter for comms)
-
there are exists unintentional deltas
(crumb #2616 for example confirmed this)
-
NOT EVERY [#] is a delta marker, and many [#] are just general markers
(context matters)
-
NOT EVERY delta is a confirmed delta MARKER
([6] and [7] are examples)
— Theory of the [6] and [7] deltas based on their usage (can only find one confirmed occurrence for each):
[6] = Device Delta Test
[7] = Word For Word Message
— Q also replied once about a [2] delta
(crumb #1756 for the [2] delta)
— Q also replied once for a [22] delta
(crumb #606 for the [22] delta, but I'm pretty sure it's a 21 minute delta, so not adding or thinking about)
— Q also noted a [17] delta between POTUS' tweets when he acknowledged an anon's request
(pun intended, crumb #2577)
-
NOT EVERY DELTA IS SHOWN IN THE GRAPHIC, just included the ones that were confirmed
— WOULD LOVE TO KNOW OTHER DELTAS TO SEE IF THIS THEORY HOLDS FOR THEM TOO
open the pics in a new tab and zoom as needed
pic1 is has the theory in it, pic2 has the [2] and [17] deltas shown without the theory