No kidding. Ugh. Silly anons.
No, it's not what we want.
What we want is to point our fingers and have others do all the heavy lifting.
Instead what we get are notables, which are discretionary, and a shortcut to the real work.
Notables are not /qresearch/. They are a quick way to catch the RHYTHM of the bread, though. Can leave clues as to whether or not one needs to go back to find their specialty there somewhere.
Dude has a lot of exposure to be a nobody.
Well? They all look alike. Had to know the difference somehow.
(Anon was very unPC there. Sorry. Maybe.)
Can't find it. Link too much to ask?
Or, each delta is the jump for the caeser cipher - applied to the misplaced caps?
A notable - even if presented as theory - should always have a source link of some kind.
Listen, I've thought about training to bake and it scares the shit out of me. Months ago helped to instigate the concept of the future - co baking - where one ran the bread and the dough and the other grabbed the notables. Didn't stick.
I have an IQ that made my high school counselor's mouth hang open, and I can't grow the balls to bake, so you won't see me shitting on them much.
Still get shills baking now and then, but for the most part bakers are vetted and in many cases, bakers are on duty, if you understand my meaning.
My advice? Let it go. Learn to depend less on notables and find a way to honor and hone your specialty interests.
Godspeed to you, too, anon.
I'm not kidding. That show on Netflix, Orphan Black. Never watched it, but from what I was told, it sounds like cabal signaling.
They've been cloning, and (((their))) clones overlap.
YES IT SOUND RIDICULOUS.
Either that, or Milano is Pelosi's kid.