Anonymous ID: e217ee Jan. 21, 2019, 1:10 p.m. No.4850542   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0568

>>4850480

>>4850377 lb

>Anything that's not ebot is notable these days.

Is this what we want?

Is that what Q came here for?

Is this attitude what will win our countries back?

What does it mean to be a patriot if not to stand up for the truth, for standards?

Ppl who aren't willing to make a defense for freedom don't deserve it.

It's bs like this that got us into this mess in the first place.

Anonymous ID: e217ee Jan. 21, 2019, 1:35 p.m. No.4850874   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0927

>>4850568

Agreed, and thank you for the level-headed perspective. At times I despair we've lost it kek.

 

If you're willing to give it, I'd appreciate your take on how we should handle speculation in notables – any set of criteria for what makes something worth noting or not, maybe past examples of when handled well, not well, whatever. Including the Brazille twat notable if you want. And/or would appreciate your take on whether/when/how to give feedback to bakers. Not trying to bait anyone into an argument, I won't reply further, just interested in your take (or other anons).

 

I'll just leave it here as far as my input:

We have carved out precious territory for ourselves in this board: our right to free speech, and our commitment to be a light of truth to the world. But we are also under heavy attack from without and within. In war, territory only exists when defended. We may disagree on how best to defend it, but letting the chips fall where they will only works when your enemy isn't stacking the deck.

 

Godspeed Anons