>>4850568
Agreed, and thank you for the level-headed perspective. At times I despair we've lost it kek.
If you're willing to give it, I'd appreciate your take on how we should handle speculation in notables – any set of criteria for what makes something worth noting or not, maybe past examples of when handled well, not well, whatever. Including the Brazille twat notable if you want. And/or would appreciate your take on whether/when/how to give feedback to bakers. Not trying to bait anyone into an argument, I won't reply further, just interested in your take (or other anons).
I'll just leave it here as far as my input:
We have carved out precious territory for ourselves in this board: our right to free speech, and our commitment to be a light of truth to the world. But we are also under heavy attack from without and within. In war, territory only exists when defended. We may disagree on how best to defend it, but letting the chips fall where they will only works when your enemy isn't stacking the deck.
Godspeed Anons