>>4851993 (lb)

>>4852002 (lb)

continuing this bread:

use the pic as a mental image of what I'm saying

>i think you're right but the messages you're gleaning from the markers aren't the full picture

right, that's why I started with this theory, I'm trying to get to the 'full picture'

>imo it's more than just for proving that Q and POTUS are coordinating, and 10 and 15 must be more than just tests

well for the [15], I think it is just a test, but my theory is that the [10] is test with a significant message (like the pen pic)

the [15] is just a pure test

>i wonder if anyone has lined everything up in order of timestamps (Q posts & POTUS tweets?)

I think clockfags have, but not sure if they'd like this theory

>if this is a metaphorical stopwatch, what "activates" it. what "starts" the clock? what stops it? etc..

so, if the "clock" is a stopwatch, EACH crumb or tweet starts the stopwatch, counting for a delta

if no delta comes, it stops, and you need to wind the clock back to 0 (metaphorically)

if a delta DOES come, you "stop the stopwatch" (metaphorically) and see what message it implies

but the [15], [10] and imo [5] deltas are the least significant, the [0], [1], and [1 year] are the most significant

>>4852039

>>4852029

try harder redditniggers

c37c82

530d7d

3fa71a

309cec

kek, blatantly pathetic

>>4852091

outward facing clock = deltas?

inward facing clock = planning?

also see: >>4852066 (continued discussion)

>>4852095

>literally not on the list

>>4852117

didn't that meme come from here?

maybe the anon who posted it got it from somewhere else, or it was original content

>>4852123

kek

<let's burn shit down because we're angry!!!!!!

protests ≠ rioting

the europeans do things differently because they're have a big fight and have for centuries

>>4852136

it's all metaphorical, but see your point with my inaccurate description

so metaphorically, you "start the stopwatch" when a tweet or crumb is posted, then see if a delta comes

if a delta comes, you "stop the stopwatch" and see what the delta implies

then wind it back to 0 for when another delta comes so you can "start the watch"

if a delta doesn't come, you likewise would need to "stop the stopwatch", after waiting for one to come, then wind it back to 0 for when another delta comes so you can "start the watch"

all metaphorical

and on the outward/inward, just spitballing, not sure it relates

>>4852158

nor would it

kek, they literally live under the EU, that's fucked to begin with

>>4852176

exactly

>>4852202

Q never accused anyone, anons took it to mean what we thought it meant

Q never said anyone's name, you've been at it all day

come back tomorrow and try again, and harder

>>4852157

>The Yellow Vests are making more change and exposing more than we are here.

muh gas tax

we don't riot, faggot

>>4852268

full pasta:

Theory on the significance of Q's confirmed delta markers:

[0] = POTUS and Q are together

[1] = Message Confirming Q or Crumbs

[5] = Message Related to Crumbs

[10] = Delta Test with Message

[15] = Delta Test (comms test)

[1 year delta] = some events occur a year after Q informed anons about it, or are reoccurring yearly

(example of an event occurring a year after Q informed anons about it was "Flynn is safe")

(example of an event reoccurring yearly is the camp david pen pics)

"Wind the clock w/ all markers" seems to indicate the "Clock" is a DELTA COUNTER, using the confirmed DELTA MARKERS of [0], [1], [5], [10], [15], and [1 year] for COMMS

IMO, THE CLOCK IS ESSENTIALLY A METAPHORICAL STOPWATCH

*Notes:

• just a theory based off confirmed deltas, AND HOW THEY ARE USED BY Q AND POTUS

• these deltas are in units of MINUTES, but anything less than a [1] delta is a [0] delta

(crumb #2140 for example confirms this)

• a delta can be between a crumb and a tweet/retweet, between tweets/retweets, or between crumbs and crumbs

(this includes tweets that correct misspelling, which also matter for comms)

• there are exists unintentional deltas

(crumb #2616 for example confirmed this)

• NOT EVERY [#] is a delta marker, and many [#] are just general markers

(context matters)

• NOT EVERY delta is a confirmed delta MARKER

([6] and [7] are examples)

— Theory of the [6] and [7] deltas based on their usage (can only find one confirmed occurrence for each):

[6] = Device Delta Test

[7] = Word For Word Message

— Q also replied once about a [2] delta

(crumb #1756 for the [2] delta)

— Q also replied once for a [22] delta

(crumb #606 for the [22] delta, but I'm pretty sure it's a 21 minute delta, so not adding or thinking about)

— Q also noted a [17] delta between POTUS' tweets when he acknowledged an anon's request

(pun intended, crumb #2577)

• NOT EVERY DELTA IS SHOWN IN THE GRAPHIC, just included the ones that were confirmed

— WOULD LOVE TO KNOW OTHER DELTAS TO SEE IF THIS THEORY HOLDS FOR THEM TOO

>>4852297

that's what happens when you poorly manage your forests, let millions of illegals into your state, and don't have enough people vote republican