baker here as last resort
>>4853873 THANK YOU!!
>>4853953 that's perfect, thanks baker!
i'm surprised no one seems to have sorted potus tweets/q posts by timestamp before but i have a feeling it'll be much easier to see all the deltas, at least between Q and potus, if it's in order. and then we can figure out what the messages are from there.
also this isn't ab actually but i was going off his theory
i'm not an excelfag by any means so any help would be greatly appreciated kek
i'll post in the baker's lounge sometime this week
>>4853979 thanks to you both!
>>4854027 that's exactly what i'm/(we're?) trying to do..i thought POTUS tweets would be more difficult but these formulas will make it easy, see above
as for Q posts, i'm not sure if there's a raw text archive that would work similarly for just copy/pasting into excel but that would be ideal
>>4854126 i don't think clockfags would have them
and do they have to be the same date?
pic related (RR out post + RR POTUS tweet were 2 days apart, :24 delta)
but then how do you explain that marker? Q literally said "marker missed?"
and if we can have a 1 year delta then why not a 234 day delta? i don't think we should limit it to start bc who knows what we could find, maybe narrow it down like that later though