Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: b189f8 No.130667 📁
Jan 22 2018 21:50:37 (EST)
PRAY.
PREY.
Notice the similarity?
Q
Nature in Făgăraș Mountains: The golden eagle in Romania https://www.romania-insider.com/nature-fagaras-mountains-golden-eagle/ via @Romania Insider
I think that was the push, that we need to use the drum, use our prayer and bring …. I felt like I denied them their prey and so they were going to take it out on me.
https://www.news4jax.com/news/politics/native-american-elder-speaks-on-lincoln-memorial-standoff
Prey/Pray mentioned
2019 is a lucky year, if you are born on these dates
https://english.manoramaonline.com/lifestyle/astro/2019/01/21/2019-is-a-lucky-year-if-your-are-born-on-these-dates.html
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 58e607 No.142428 📁
Jan 23 2018 21:30:34 (EST)
@Snowden
How’s Russia?
Almost time.
Q
Honorary doctorate for Snowden : No decision yet
https://www.rtl.de/cms/ehrendoktorwuerde-fuer-snowden-noch-keine-entscheidung-4281644.html
In the dispute over the awarding of an honorary doctorate from the Philosophical Faculty of the University of Rostock to the "whistleblower" Edward Snowden since 2014, no decision is in sight. It could not be called a date for a ceremony, said a spokeswoman for the Oberverwaltungsgericht in Greifwald on Monday the German Press Agency.
In the past year, well over 1000 cases have been brought before the court. Their handling is concerned firstly with the age of the proceedings and secondly with importance and urgency. "Taking these priorities into account, no appointment can be named."
In April 2014, the Faculty of Arts decided to award Snowden with an honorary doctorate, honoring his contribution to the provision and processing of important data. In contrast, university rector Wolfgang Schareck was. The transfer of the data is not a special scientific achievement that justifies an honorary doctorate.
Snowden, "the powerful skip the law without paying for it"
The American ex-analyst living in Russia participated in a videoconference
SAN FRANCISCO- Former National Security Agency (NSA) exanalist Edward Snowden, who has been in Russia for more than five years, said yesterday that "the powerful keep breaking the law without paying the consequences for it" and encouraged citizens to take risks to end this "impunity". "In 2013 I took a step forward because I realized that people in positions of power were carrying out gross violations of civil rights. But to change things you have to take risks. That's what I did and that's why I can not go back home, "Snowden said. The NSA exanalista participated by videoconference in a talk in San Francisco (USA) about freedom, human rights and "authoritarian tendencies" in the world, in which lawyer Wolfgang Kaleck also spoke,Law versus Power .
In June 2013, Snowden, who previously had also worked for the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), leaked thousands of NSA classified documents to the press that, among other things, revealed a system of mass espionage by the American government. Since then, the 35-year-old ex-analyst has been persecuted by the US Justice and resides in Russia, where he arrived first as a political asylee and has a residence permit valid until 2020.
"Governments ensure a certain level of impunity because it gives them flexibility in what they consider to be in the national interest. It's not just that they're spying on us, it's that we're less free. What we now call privacy, we used to call it freedom, "Snowden said.
The NSA exanalista explained that when he started working for the agency, he did not do it "with bad intentions", but he wanted to help create something good. - Efe
https://www.noticiasdegipuzkoa.eus/2019/01/21/mundo/snowden-los-poderosos-se-saltan-la-ley-sin-pagar-por-ello
Australian commission to review biometric time and attendance impact on privacy
Australia’s Fair Work Commission will hear an appeal by a Queensland sawmill employee claiming his dismissal for refusing to participate in a biometric time and attendance system violates his right to privacy, the Australia Financial Review reports.
The unfair dismissal claim against Superior Woods of Queensland was rejected late last year by the commission, but on review the bench said the legality of firing a worker for refusing to provide biometric data under Australian law has not yet been examined.
“We are satisfied that the appeal raises important, novel and emerging issues, not previously the subject of full bench consideration or guidance,” the bench said.
Sawmill worker Jeremy Lee cites the trade in personal data among large tech companies, and the surveillance practices revealed by Edward Snowden in support of his claim.
Fair Work Commissioner Jennifer Hunt said in the initial ruling that the company’s policy itself was not unlawful, and that the biometric scanners improve safety by allowing for quick headcounts during an evacuation. She did note, however, that the company’s lack of required notices may breach Australia’s Privacy Act. Superior Woods argued that employee records are exempt from the Privacy Act, and therefore so are the processes of obtaining those records. That connection was included in the grounds for appeal identified by the commission, as was the suggestion that proving a fingerprint scan implies consent on the part of the employee.
https://www.biometricupdate.com/201901/australian-commission-to-review-biometric-time-and-attendance-impact-on-privacy
Good Jill vs. Bad Jill Lessons in journalism — and business — from my time editing the New York Times.
2013 was a difficult year. We were beaten by the Washington Post and the Guardian on Edward Snowden’s purloined documents revealing widespread NSA eavesdropping.
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/01/jill-abramson-merchants-of-truth-book-excerpt.html